2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32622-7_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Size Effects in Networks of Coupled Neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a number of nodes of the order of 500 for each ring covers adequately the computational brain division. 2 From previous studies of the LIF and FitzHugh Nagumo networks we have seen that a number of 500-1000 nodes is good enough to avoid finite size effects which are dominant in smaller sizes (Tsigkri-DeSmedt et al, 2020).…”
Section: Synchronization Patterns For Positive Inter-ring Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a number of nodes of the order of 500 for each ring covers adequately the computational brain division. 2 From previous studies of the LIF and FitzHugh Nagumo networks we have seen that a number of 500-1000 nodes is good enough to avoid finite size effects which are dominant in smaller sizes (Tsigkri-DeSmedt et al, 2020).…”
Section: Synchronization Patterns For Positive Inter-ring Couplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work Kuramoto and Battogtokh used the phase oscillator to assimilate the behavior of neurons. Later on, chimera states were found in other neuronal models, such as in the FitzHugh-Nagumo [2][3][4], Hindmarsh-Rose [5,6], Van der Pol [7] and in the Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) models [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%