2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/1829385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Study on the Preservation of Normal Knee Kinematics with Respect to the Prosthetic Design in Patient-Specific Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract: Alterations in native knee kinematics in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are caused by the nonanatomic articular surface of conventional implants. Technology for an anatomy mimetic patient-specific (PS) UKA has been introduced. However, there have been no studies on evaluating the preservation of native knee kinematics with respect to different prosthetic designs in PS UKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the preservation of native knee kinematics with respect to different UKA designs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the early 1990s, medial-pivot (MP) TKA was introduced to restore “natural knee kinematics.” The aim was to reproduce the physiologic ball-in-socket mechanism of the medial femoral condyle, while the lateral compartment, being less constrained, allowed an anteroposterior roll of the lateral femoral condyle during knee flexion-extension motion [ 12 , 13 ]. This implant design should avoid the “paradoxical” anterior rolling of the femoral condyles during knee flexion present in various prosthetic models such as the Posterior Stabilized (PS) or the Cruciate Retaining (CR), which reproduce non-physiological knee kinematics [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early 1990s, medial-pivot (MP) TKA was introduced to restore “natural knee kinematics.” The aim was to reproduce the physiologic ball-in-socket mechanism of the medial femoral condyle, while the lateral compartment, being less constrained, allowed an anteroposterior roll of the lateral femoral condyle during knee flexion-extension motion [ 12 , 13 ]. This implant design should avoid the “paradoxical” anterior rolling of the femoral condyles during knee flexion present in various prosthetic models such as the Posterior Stabilized (PS) or the Cruciate Retaining (CR), which reproduce non-physiological knee kinematics [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine lower extremity DVT include underlying patient disease, including the patient's own risk factors for lower extremity vascular disease, diabetic hypertension, dyslipidemia, longterm smoking, and heart valve disease [26]. Therefore, correct preoperative assessment and adequate preoperative preparation are beneficial to predict and prevent the formation of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results show the importance of tibiofemoral conformity in preserving the native knee kinematics in patient-specific mobile-bearing UKA [90]. This importance was proved in not only mobile-bearing but also fixed-bearing medial patient-specific UKA [97,98]. The etiology of failure mechanisms is important in the delivery of appropriate care [56].…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionmentioning
confidence: 74%