2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element modeling of confined concrete-II: Plastic-damage model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
119
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 360 publications
(153 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
119
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The yield criterion described in Lubliner et al (1989) and modified in Lee and Fenves (1998) was adopted in this paper. This yield function reduces to DruckerPrager yield function when concrete is in triaxial compression (Yu et al 2010b) as given by the following function:…”
Section: Damaged Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The yield criterion described in Lubliner et al (1989) and modified in Lee and Fenves (1998) was adopted in this paper. This yield function reduces to DruckerPrager yield function when concrete is in triaxial compression (Yu et al 2010b) as given by the following function:…”
Section: Damaged Plasticity Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They proposed a stress-strain model for confined concrete under monotonic compression, which was widely used by many researchers. More recently, many researchers were interested in investigating the behavior of concrete confined by FRP jackets (Mirmiran and Shahawy 1997;Fam and Rizkalla 2001;Harries and Kharel 2002;Jiang and Teng 2007;Yu et al 2010aYu et al , 2010b. Teng et al (2007) proposed a uniaxial stress-strain model to predict the behavior of FRP confined concrete by modifying the model by Mander et al (1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used parameters in these damage models are stress, deformation, stiffness and modulus. The damage of concrete materials subjected to uni-axial compression can be described by Equation 2-31 in terms of the ratio of decaying stress to peak stress Yu et al [35]. Following the same pattern, Soh and Bhalla [36] defined the damage of concrete material in term of stiffness instead of stress.…”
Section: Damage Models For Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed damage model, together with the models proposed by Yu et al [35], Chen et al [37] and Amziane and Dubé [38], is applied to assess the damage of different concrete with the strengths [96] model is employed to calculate parameters for Yu et al [35], Chen et al [37] and Amziane and Dubé [38] models. proposed index and that of Yu et al [35] both show a damage index of zero while Chen et al [37] and Amaziane and Dubé [38] models produce damage indices of 0.06 and 0.08, respectively.…”
Section: Validation Of the Proposed Model For Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation