2013
DOI: 10.1002/stc.1601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite element model updating using frequency response functions and numerical sensitivities

Abstract: SUMMARY A new method is presented for finite element model (FEM) updating using frequency response functions and numerical sensitivities. The proposed method differs from methods currently in the literature by using numerical sensitivities to solve the inverse problem instead of analytical sensitivities. This method combines the usefulness of commercially available finite element modeling programs with advanced optimization algorithms to solve the inverse problem while requiring neither model reduction nor dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study of 3D truss example 14 elements are considered as measured elements. Among the groups of elements from the SSE view point, elements 1,2,9,10,11,12,14,18,22,27,34,40,42, and 44 are selected. The selection of measurement elements based on the insight provided by SSE (among both groups) as well as the precision of developed sensitivity equation will improve the damage detection process.…”
Section: D Truss Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study of 3D truss example 14 elements are considered as measured elements. Among the groups of elements from the SSE view point, elements 1,2,9,10,11,12,14,18,22,27,34,40,42, and 44 are selected. The selection of measurement elements based on the insight provided by SSE (among both groups) as well as the precision of developed sensitivity equation will improve the damage detection process.…”
Section: D Truss Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…FRF-based methods provide more data suitable for model updating as compared with modal methods [15][16][17]. In this regard, reference is made to Esfandiari et al [16] who worked on the development of quasi linear sensitivity equation using FRF as metric, Sipple and Sanayei [18] who presented a method based on numerical sensitivities, and Yuan and Yu [19] who conducted two stage model updating based on vibration data of base excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Figure 11 shows, the proposed approximation of α d (ω) by Eqs. (15) and (16) represents a highly acceptable match with the exact values. Additionally, for the selected frequency ranges described earlier, the approximated formula works well.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the initial values of α(ω) and Ω n in Eqs. (15) and (16) are updated iteratively to converge to the corresponding values of damaged structure.…”
Section: Proposed Model Updating Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation