2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2176323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite Element Computation of Magnetic Vibration Sources in 100 kW Two Fractional-Slot Interior Permanent Magnet Machines for Ship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Zarko et al [132] used the FEM to calculate the UMF of a salient-pole synchronous generator in no-load and loaded conditions. Lee et al [133] adopted the 2D FEM to model magnetic vibration sources in two 100-kW marine fractional-slot interior permanent magnet machines with different pole and slot combinations.…”
Section: D Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zarko et al [132] used the FEM to calculate the UMF of a salient-pole synchronous generator in no-load and loaded conditions. Lee et al [133] adopted the 2D FEM to model magnetic vibration sources in two 100-kW marine fractional-slot interior permanent magnet machines with different pole and slot combinations.…”
Section: D Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been very limited studies on the analytical investigation of interharmonic magnetic field in FSCW interior permanent-magnet synchronous machines (IPMSMs). The existing research studies are mainly concentrated on the numerical analysis of the magnetic field and its associated vibrations in FSCW IPMSMs [16]- [18]. More importantly, they all only focus on the low-frequency components contributed by the permanent magnets (PMs) and stator armature reaction.…”
Section: Nomenclature α υmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequencies of vibration are caused by electromagnetic forces, i.e. cogging torque ( f cog ), torque ripple ( f rip ), and radial force ( f rad ) and they are calculated as [12,13]…”
Section: Experimental Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%