1994
DOI: 10.1190/1.1443590
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Finite‐difference modeling in transversely isotropic media

Abstract: We developed a modeling algorithm for transversely isotropic media that uses finite‐difference operators in a staggered grid. Staggered grid schemes are more stable than the conventional finite‐difference methods because the differences are actually based on half the grid spacing. This modeling algorithm uses the full elastic wave equation that makes possible the modeling of all kinds of waves propagating in transversely isotropic media. The spatial derivatives are represented by fourth‐order, finite‐differenc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They also provide necessary wavefield solutions for imaging (especially, reverse time migration) and full waveform inversion. Many numerical methods have been proposed to solve wave equations, among which the finite-difference method has been a popular choice (e.g., Kelly et al, 1976;Virieux, 1984Virieux, , 1986Levander, 1988;Faria and Stoffa, 1994;Igel et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1996;Saenger and Bohlen, 2004;Etgen and O'Brien, 2007). Another commonly used method is the pseudospectral method (e.g., Gazdag, 1981;Kosloff and Baysal, 1982;Kosloff et al, 1984;Fornberg, 1987;Reshef et al, 1988aReshef et al, , 1988bCarcione et al, 1992;Carcione, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…They also provide necessary wavefield solutions for imaging (especially, reverse time migration) and full waveform inversion. Many numerical methods have been proposed to solve wave equations, among which the finite-difference method has been a popular choice (e.g., Kelly et al, 1976;Virieux, 1984Virieux, , 1986Levander, 1988;Faria and Stoffa, 1994;Igel et al, 1995;Wu et al, 1996;Saenger and Bohlen, 2004;Etgen and O'Brien, 2007). Another commonly used method is the pseudospectral method (e.g., Gazdag, 1981;Kosloff and Baysal, 1982;Kosloff et al, 1984;Fornberg, 1987;Reshef et al, 1988aReshef et al, , 1988bCarcione et al, 1992;Carcione, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The wave-field snapshots in the xy plane (transverse plane) for the displacement three components, shown in Figures 8a, 9a, and 10a, show that the wavefronts of P and S waves are a circle in the VTI medium, whereas other snapshots in Figures 8,9,and 10 show that the wavefronts of P-and S-waves are an ellipse and the qP and qSV waves show the directional dependence on propagation velocity. The qSV wavefronts can have cusps and triplications depending on the value of c 13 (Faria and Stoffa, 1994). Triplications can be observed in the horizontal component qSV wavefronts (shown in Figs.…”
Section: Wave Fields Modelingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The methods to solve the propagation of seismic waves mainly include wave-field simulation (Carcione et al 1992;Lan and Zhang 2011;Liu et al 2014a, b), seismic ray tracing (Cerveny 2001;Cardarelli and Cerreto 2002;Xu et al 2006Xu et al , 2008Xu et al , 2010Xu et al , 2014 and traveltime calculation using eikonal equation (Faria and Stoffa 1994;Lan and Zhang 2013a, b). Compared with the method of traveltime calculation using eikonal equation, ray tracing methods not only can obtain the traveltime of the seismic wave field, but also can get the ray trajectories in the ground (Shearer and Chapman 1989;Cerveny 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%