2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.87.115023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine tuning in the constrained exceptional supersymmetric standard model

Abstract: Supersymmetric unified models in which the Z couples to the Higgs doublets, as in the E 6 class of models, have large fine tuning dominated by the experimental mass limit on the Z . To illustrate this we investigate the degree of fine tuning throughout the parameter space of the Constrained Exceptional Supersymmetric Standard Model (cE 6 SSM) that is consistent with a Higgs mass m h ∼ 125 GeV. Fixing tan β = 10, and taking specific values of the mass of the Z boson, with M Z ∼ 2 − 4 TeV. We find that the minim… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 94 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between the extra singlet superfield, whose vacuum expectation value (VEV) breaks the U(1) ′ , and the two Higgs doublets helps to increase the mass of the SM-like Higgs at the tree level. This contribution is the same as in the next-to-MSSM (NMSSM) [17][18][19][20]. In addition, the SM-like Higgs boson mass is also enhanced by the U(1) ′ D-term contribution [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…The interaction between the extra singlet superfield, whose vacuum expectation value (VEV) breaks the U(1) ′ , and the two Higgs doublets helps to increase the mass of the SM-like Higgs at the tree level. This contribution is the same as in the next-to-MSSM (NMSSM) [17][18][19][20]. In addition, the SM-like Higgs boson mass is also enhanced by the U(1) ′ D-term contribution [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…With the current CMS experimental mass limit for the Z in the E 6 SSM of M Z 2.08 TeV [7] it is clear that there is already a significant, perhaps dominant, amount of fine-tuning due to the Z mass limit, and furthermore this source of fine-tuning increasing quadratically with M Z will rapidly overtake the logarithmic fine-tuning due to the stop mass limits, as the experimental mass limits of both types of particles increases in the future. This was first pointed out in [8] and has been discussed quantitatively [9] in the framework of the constrained E 6 SSM [10], where it has been verified that this new source of fine-tuning dominates over all other sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Radiative corrections can accommodate m h 125 GeV but only at the expense of either 1. having top squark masses beyond the TeV scale along with large mixing [29], or else 2. enlarging the MSSM to contain additional contributions to m h [30,31,32]. The first of these possibilities again seems in violation of naturalness limits which according to many studies require mt 1,2 , mb 1 500 GeV [33,34,35,36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%