1986
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861001)58:7<1493::aid-cncr2820580720>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fine-needle aspiration of breast cancer: Relationship of clinical factors to cytology results in 689 primary malignancies

Abstract: Between 1980 and 1983, 689 women with primary breast cancer at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and associated Hospitals had fine-needle aspiration biopsies prior to definitive surgery. Clinical factors relating to the success of these aspirations were evaluated. The most significant factor was which physician performed the aspiration. Size of the lesion was also an important variable; however, size difference could not account for the marked variation between different individuals performing the aspiration. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Cytologists reporting breast specimens are well aware that consultants and senior registrars perform much better than inexperienced junior staV, particularly in achieving an adequate specimen. Pathologists have been shown to be highly eVective aspirators of breasts and non-breast lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Cytologists reporting breast specimens are well aware that consultants and senior registrars perform much better than inexperienced junior staV, particularly in achieving an adequate specimen. Pathologists have been shown to be highly eVective aspirators of breasts and non-breast lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the 20% termed suspicious for the screening series was double that found in our larger series of symptomatic cases. 6 The most likely explanations for this include poor representation of malignant cells in the specimen as a consequence of size and occult nature, as well as the tendency of screening cancers to be well differentiated or of special type,'3 rendering unequivocal cytological distinction of malignancy more difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when targeted accurately and sampled, interpretation may be difficult. To reduce geographical misses during aspiration and improve pathological interpretation, experienced aspirators and pathologists are respectively key (10,11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%