Financial Inclusion in Asia 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-58337-6_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Financial Inclusion in Sri Lanka: Current Status and Issues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result shows that Egypt is classified as one of the countries that has low digital financial inclusion level (FI index ≤ 0.5). The low level of digital financial inclusion can be attributed to different reasons; limited accessibility and acceptance of digital finance, lack of awareness of digital financial services and products, low digital skills, preference to deal directly with a bank officer, and finally lack of trust in digital financial services (Tilakaratna, 2016 andCentral Bank of Egypt, 2018)…”
Section: Estimated Results For Digital Financial Inclusion Index: (Fid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result shows that Egypt is classified as one of the countries that has low digital financial inclusion level (FI index ≤ 0.5). The low level of digital financial inclusion can be attributed to different reasons; limited accessibility and acceptance of digital finance, lack of awareness of digital financial services and products, low digital skills, preference to deal directly with a bank officer, and finally lack of trust in digital financial services (Tilakaratna, 2016 andCentral Bank of Egypt, 2018)…”
Section: Estimated Results For Digital Financial Inclusion Index: (Fid)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their evaluation is reflected in Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PeU). Whereas perceived usefulness is a user perception that using the new system would increase his/her performance in the organization and perceived ease of use is the extent to which using the new system would require minimal effort on a user"s behalf (Tilakaratna, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adoption of technology depends on personal behaviour and external environment. People perceive that by using technology, they will obtain more benefits without doing much physical and mental effort (Tilakaratna, 2016). Davis et al (1989), describe TAM as an information system theory that models how users come to accept and use a technology based system.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their evaluation is reflected in the perceived usefulness and the perceived ease of use. Perceived usefulness looks at it from the angle that as he/she makes use of this technology, it would in turn lead to an increase in his/her performance in organizational activities, whereas perceived ease of use considers how much effort needs to be put in place to get the best out of the new technology (Tilakaratna, 2016;Yoshino and Morgan, 2016). The second stage involves the attitude of the user.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The way a person accepts or rejects a new technology is dependent on personal behaviors and external environment. Most people believe that by making use of technology, they would not have to exert much physical and mental strength (Tilakaratna, 2016). E-banking products must be structured and made available in a way that makes payment effortless and helps stir the nation toward a cashless economy (Nwankwo and Richard, 2012;Ogbeide, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%