SAE Technical Paper Series 2000
DOI: 10.4271/2000-01-2030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Film-Forming Properties of Zinc-Based and Ashless Antiwear Additives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation Since the formation of these tribofilms initiates in rolling-sliding contact applications, some researchers believed it was caused by increased surface roughness [53,54]. Other work suggested the growth of the films can be additionally attributed to the high, localized contact pressures caused by the asperity contact between surfaces [55,56].…”
Section: Lubricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation Since the formation of these tribofilms initiates in rolling-sliding contact applications, some researchers believed it was caused by increased surface roughness [53,54]. Other work suggested the growth of the films can be additionally attributed to the high, localized contact pressures caused by the asperity contact between surfaces [55,56].…”
Section: Lubricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of such films can be measured by the minitraction machine (MTM). 3 In this report the kinetics of the formation of the film was measured. Here, we only show the stabilized effect of two additives after 3 hours (Figure 8).…”
Section: An Anti-wear System For Medium-and Low-ash Phosphorus and Smentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such patchiness is generally undesirable since it significantly increases surface roughness, especially for initially smooth surfaces [11,12,13,14,15,1,16,17,18,19] and consequently leads to higher asperity stresses with the associated risk of surface damage. AW additives have been observed to cause an increase in coe cient of friction in mixed lubrication regime [5,20,17,16]. This was initially thought to be related to increased surface roughness and tribofilm directionality [5,17], although more detailed studies performed by Spikes and Taylor [16,21] suggest that e↵ects other than surface roughness may also play a role in the mechanism through which ZDDP increases the coe cient of friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…AW additives have been observed to cause an increase in coe cient of friction in mixed lubrication regime [5,20,17,16]. This was initially thought to be related to increased surface roughness and tribofilm directionality [5,17], although more detailed studies performed by Spikes and Taylor [16,21] suggest that e↵ects other than surface roughness may also play a role in the mechanism through which ZDDP increases the coe cient of friction. As the formation of AW films is tribologically triggered, some researchers have attributed the morphology of anti-wear tribofilms to asperities present initially on tested specimens with preferential tribofilm formation in such regions resulting from increased local contact pressure [22,23,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation