“…Later, the lack of filaggrin in the epidermis was proposed in the commercially available strain of Flg ft mice, which has both Flg and ma mutations, as a model of IV, and therefore there was no discussion about the cutaneous inflammatory conditions from the perspective of AD (Presland, et al, 2000). There have been four recent papers of Flg ft mice as a model of filaggrin deficiency: the first paper used Flg ft mice from which the ma mutation had been eliminated with four additional backcrosses to B6 mice (Fallon, et al, 2009), and the others used the commercially available Flg ft mice (Moniaga, et al, 2010, Oyoshi, et al, 2009, Scharschmidt, et al, 2009). The first report showed only histological abnormality without clinical manifestation (Fallon, et al, 2009), and the second demonstrated spontaneous eczematous skin lesions after 28 weeks of www.intechopen.com age (Oyoshi, et al, 2009), and the third contained no notice of any spontaneous dermatitis in Flg ft mice (Scharschmidt, et al, 2009).…”