1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7722(96)00068-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field tracer experiment in a low permeability fractured medium: results from El Berrocal site

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since longitudinal dispersivity is a one‐dimensional parameter, flow distance was chosen as an appropriate scale of measurement. For a laboratory experiment, flow distance was generally determined by measuring the length of the horizontally oriented core through which the tracer traveled (e.g., Schulze‐Makuch 1996); for a field tracer test, by determining the distance between the injection and the withdrawal well (e.g., D’Alessandro et al 1997); and for a computer simulation, by the horizontal flow distance between a ground water source and a sink. The scale for single‐well injection tests and packer tracer tests was obtained by determining the radius of influence, which was calculated from the volume of water introduced (i.e., discharge or injection rate multiplied by the time interval) by assuming cylindrical flow to the well screen or packed interval, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since longitudinal dispersivity is a one‐dimensional parameter, flow distance was chosen as an appropriate scale of measurement. For a laboratory experiment, flow distance was generally determined by measuring the length of the horizontally oriented core through which the tracer traveled (e.g., Schulze‐Makuch 1996); for a field tracer test, by determining the distance between the injection and the withdrawal well (e.g., D’Alessandro et al 1997); and for a computer simulation, by the horizontal flow distance between a ground water source and a sink. The scale for single‐well injection tests and packer tracer tests was obtained by determining the radius of influence, which was calculated from the volume of water introduced (i.e., discharge or injection rate multiplied by the time interval) by assuming cylindrical flow to the well screen or packed interval, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many in situ experiments using nonsorbing tracers have been performed in fractured rock [ Birgersson et al , 1992; D'Alessandro et al , 1997; Haggerty et al , 2001; Himmelsbach et al , 1998; Sawada et al , 2000; Karasaki et al , 2000]. Although in situ tests with nonsorbing tracers are important for characterizing transport properties of rock volumes, reliable quantification of retention properties generally requires sorbing tracers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the scope of the study, conservative or reactive tracers are used. Conservative tracers do not interact with the surrounding geological material; they are inert [10][11][12][13][14]. The positron-emitting halide 18 F is widely used as conservative tracer in geochemical studies, but the chemical inertness of the tracers depends strongly on the boundary conditions and the studied substrate.…”
Section: Introduction 1motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%