Field Synopsis of the Role of Sex in Stroke Prediction Models

Abstract

BackgroundGuidelines for stroke prevention recommend development of sex‐specific stroke risk scores. Incorporating sex in Clinical Prediction Models (CPMs) may support sex‐specific clinical decision making. To better understand their potential to guide sex‐specific care, we conducted a field synopsis of the role of sex in stroke‐related CPMs.Methods and ResultsWe identified stroke‐related CPMs in the Tufts Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness CPM Database, a systematic summary of cardiovascular CPMs published from January 1990 to May 2012. We report the proportion of models including the effect of sex on stroke incidence or prognosis, summarize the directionality of the predictive effects of sex, and explore factors influencing the inclusion of sex. Of 92 stroke‐related CPMs, 30 (33%) contained a coefficient for sex or presented sex‐stratified models. Only 12/58 (21%) CPMs predicting outcomes in patients included sex, compared to 18/30 (60%) models predicting first stroke (P<0.0001). Sex was most commonly included in models predicting stroke among a general population (69%). Female sex was consistently associated with reduced mortality after ischemic stroke (n=4) and higher risk of stroke from arrhythmias or coronary revascularization (n=5). Models predicting first stroke versus outcomes among patients with stroke (odds ratio=5.75, 95% CI 2.18–15.14, P<0.001) and those developed from larger versus smaller sample sizes (odds ratio=4.58, 95% CI 1.73–12.13, P=0.002) were significantly more likely to include sex.ConclusionsSex is included in a minority of published CPMs, but more frequently in models predicting incidence of first stroke. The importance of sex‐specific care may be especially well established for primary prevention.

Acetaminophen-induced Acute Liver Failure Is More Common and More Severe in Women

“…Sex differences in the epidemiology and natural history of many diseases are evident, with growing adoption of sex-based models of care for medical conditions outside the realm of hepatology (4–6). Sex differences are also described in the presentation and clinical course of many liver diseases (7), including a higher risk of ALF in women for many etiologies (8–11).…”

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Graft Loss Among Female Liver Transplant Recipients

“…Historically, there have been limited data on the epidemiology and management of women, with resulting disparities in health outcomes [24,25]. There is now a growing recognition of sex-specific models of care, which have been incorporated into the management of women with cardiovascular and renal disease [1–3]. Although sex differences are evident in the natural history and treatment response of many chronic liver diseases [4], gastroenterology and hepatology rank among the lowest subspecialties in published sex-specific research [25].…”

“…THERE is growing recognition of the importance of individualized medicine, including gender-specific models of care. Sex differences in coronary and stroke risk, for example, have resulted in the incorporation of sex in clinical prediction models to better prognosticate cardiovascular outcomes [1,2]. Similarly, sex differences in risk of progressive kidney disease have led to the incorporation of sex in validated prediction tools for identifying individuals at risk for renal failure [3].…”

Alternative Splicing of Putative Stroke/Vascular Risk Factor Genes Expressed in Blood Following Ischemic Stroke Is Sexually Dimorphic and Cause-Specific

“…Sexual dimorphism exists for etiology, pathology, outcome, and IS risk factors (2)(3)(4)(5)(6). This has led to the development of maleand female-specific clinical guidelines (7) and prediction models (8). However, GWAS-identified risk loci have only recently been examined for sex differences and higher heritability has been reported in women (9,10).…”