2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
83
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
83
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…As a matter of fact, the out-of-plane collapse of unreinforced masonry walls tends to occur at lower intensities than those required to produce collapse or heavy damage for in-plane response. Such fact, well known in the earthquake engineering community, has been convincingly demonstrated in recent earthquakes damage surveys in Italy (Decanini et al 2004;Augenti and Parisi 2010;D'Ayala and Paganoni 2011), Spain (Romão et al 2013), Turkey (Bayraktar et al 2007a;Sayın et al 2013Sayın et al , 2014 or in Pakistan (Maqsood and Schwarz 2010). Figure 1 depicts some examples of damage on traditional unreinforced stone masonry buildings, recorded after the magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck L'Aquila city centre (central Italy) on the 6th of April 2009.…”
Section: Seismic Performance Of Stone Masonry Structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a matter of fact, the out-of-plane collapse of unreinforced masonry walls tends to occur at lower intensities than those required to produce collapse or heavy damage for in-plane response. Such fact, well known in the earthquake engineering community, has been convincingly demonstrated in recent earthquakes damage surveys in Italy (Decanini et al 2004;Augenti and Parisi 2010;D'Ayala and Paganoni 2011), Spain (Romão et al 2013), Turkey (Bayraktar et al 2007a;Sayın et al 2013Sayın et al , 2014 or in Pakistan (Maqsood and Schwarz 2010). Figure 1 depicts some examples of damage on traditional unreinforced stone masonry buildings, recorded after the magnitude 6.3 earthquake that struck L'Aquila city centre (central Italy) on the 6th of April 2009.…”
Section: Seismic Performance Of Stone Masonry Structuresmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The seismic behaviour of RC structures is a widely studied theme in the last decades, however the experimental response of RC elements under biaxial cyclic bending still very limited [1,2]. Rodrigues et al [3][4][5][6][7] tested 17 RC specimens with four types of full-scale rectangular building columns tested for different loading histories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They used the results of 186 half-scale square panels to define the infill Fig. 1 a Infill walls collapse (Romão et al 2013), b soft-storey mechanism (Costa et al 2010) and c out-of-plane and in-plane damage mechanisms in exterior masonry walls (Romão et al 2013) panel nonlinear material properties. Lofti and Shing studied in 1991 the efficiency of homogenous smeared-crack models to capture the response of reinforced masonry wall, and they showed that the smeared-crack model can accurately capture the flexural failure of the reinforced masonry wall (Lofti and Shing 1991).…”
Section: Micro-modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%