2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-4311(03)00166-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field experiments and analyses on a hybrid solar collector

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1b shows the difference monthly, current energy of the hybrid system and amorphous silicon photovoltaic per unit area of the panels 0.7 and 0.4 MJ / m 2 d, respectively, with the value of hybrid solar collector energy it was about 80%,A Where the efficiency decreased because snow due to thickness of snow in Fig. 1c below shows the monthly and annual variation of provider of domestic hot water energy, where it was 13.1 GJ which was comparable to that value for the flat plate solar collector 46.3% [19]. …”
Section: Performance Experiments On a Hybrid Pv/ T Solar Collectormentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1b shows the difference monthly, current energy of the hybrid system and amorphous silicon photovoltaic per unit area of the panels 0.7 and 0.4 MJ / m 2 d, respectively, with the value of hybrid solar collector energy it was about 80%,A Where the efficiency decreased because snow due to thickness of snow in Fig. 1c below shows the monthly and annual variation of provider of domestic hot water energy, where it was 13.1 GJ which was comparable to that value for the flat plate solar collector 46.3% [19]. …”
Section: Performance Experiments On a Hybrid Pv/ T Solar Collectormentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Where found that the conversion efficiency ranged from 10% to 13%, and collector efficiency was from 20 to 40 ºC marinade than 40% heat and 50% and about 20% of successive. [18] Although there was reduced of collector efficiency, it has compared the efficiency of the hybrid solar collectors for this photovoltaic solar collectors, where were reads in the observational results of this study annual operation to assemble solar hybrid and the Fig. 1a below show the maximum monthly amount of current energy 45.3 MJ / m 2 in June, and the minimum 2.8 MJ / m 2 in January, it means conversion efficiency groups.…”
Section: Performance Experiments On a Hybrid Pv/ T Solar Collectormentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In Figure 1b shows the difference monthly, current energy of the hybrid system and amorphous silicon photovoltaic per unit area of the panels 0.7 and 0.4 MJ / m 2 d, respectively, with the value of hybrid solar collector energy it was about 80%,A Where the efficiency decreased because snow due to thickness of snow in Figure 1c below shows the monthly and annual variation of provider of domestic hot water energy, where it was 13.1 GJ which was comparable to that value for the flat plate solar collector 46.3% [3].…”
Section: Perform Experiments On a Hybrid Pv/ T Solar Collectormentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Where found that the conversion efficiency ranged from 10% to 13%, and collector efficiency was from 20 to 40 ºC marinade than 40% heat and 50% and about 20% of successive [3]. Although there was reduced of collector efficiency, it has compared the efficiency of the hybrid solar collectors for this photovoltaic solar collectors, where were reads in the observational results of this study annual operation to assemble solar hybrid and the Figure 1a below show the maximum monthly amount of current energy 45.3 MJ / m 2 in June, and the minimum 2.8 MJ / m 2 in January, it means conversion efficiency groups.…”
Section: Perform Experiments On a Hybrid Pv/ T Solar Collectormentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation