2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mee.2013.02.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field electron emission properties of vertically aligned carbon nanotubes deposited on a nanostructured porous silicon template: The hidden role of the hydrocarbon/catalyst ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the as-grown VACNT, E th was ∼3.2 V μm −1 , consistent with previously published values for CNT arrays. 32,33 E th for the wetted VACNT decreased to ∼1.8 V μm −1 , and for VACNT/DLC E th ∼2.1 V μm −1 . These data are all consistent with the F−N model for electron emission via quantum mechanical tunnelling through a potential barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the as-grown VACNT, E th was ∼3.2 V μm −1 , consistent with previously published values for CNT arrays. 32,33 E th for the wetted VACNT decreased to ∼1.8 V μm −1 , and for VACNT/DLC E th ∼2.1 V μm −1 . These data are all consistent with the F−N model for electron emission via quantum mechanical tunnelling through a potential barrier.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…37,38 Note that the geometrical β (∼2000) calculated from (h/r) using the height (h) and radius (r) of the individual nanotubes is considerably lower than the values calculated from these F−N plots, a finding which is often reported for field-emission from VACNT forests. 32 There are a number of possible suggested reasons for this difference, including (a) perturbations of the electric field because of the experimental configuration, especially the interelectrode separation, 39 (b) the emission being a multistage process from many adjacent emitting tips rather than being from one isolated tip, 40 (c) electrical and thermal conduction effects from the surrounding VACNT forest, 36 and/or (d) high field enhancement at the nanotube−substrate−vacuum triple junction at the base of the CNTs causing electrons to be emitted directly into the vacuum. 32 Thus, it is clear that although the absolute magnitude of β values derived from F−N plots should be regarded with caution, 38 so long as they were measured under identical conditions then sensible deductions can be made based on their relative values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 a presents the J – E curves of the synthesized VACNT bundles. The turn-on electric fields ( E to ) corresponding to the current density of 10 −2 mA cm −2 [ 13 , 14 ] for samples A, B, C, and D were approximately 2.0, 2.8, 1.6, and 2.5 V μm −1 , respectively. Figure 3b shows the FN plots of the synthesized samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3a presents the J-E curves of the synthesized VACNT bundles. The turn-on electric fields (E to ) corresponding to the current density of 10 −2 mA cm −2 [13,14] for samples A, B, C, and D were approximately 2.0, 2.8, 1.6, and 2.5 V μm −1 , respectively. Figure 3b shows the FN plots of the synthesized samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%