1994
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90161994000100018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field determined variation of the unsaturated hydraulic conductivity functions using simplified analysis of internal drainage experiments

Abstract: Experimentally determined values of unsaturated soil hydraulic conductivity are presented for an Alfisol of the county of Piracicaba, S.P., Brazil. Simultaneous measurements of soil water content and pressure head are made along a 125 m transect within an irrigated field during the internal drainage process. Calculations of the soil hydraulic conductivity were made using the instantaneous profile method (Watson, 1966) and the unit gradient method (LIBARDI et al., 1980). The spatial variability of the soil hydr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The soil conductivity function, at the reference plane, can be estimated under the following hypothesis [47]: (i) the volumetric water content at soil surface (θ0) was assumed to be equal to θ1; (ii) at the reference plane (z4), the volumetric water content (θ4) was assumed to be equal to θ3. Figure 5 illustrates the schematic layout of the SHYPROM system used in our laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Evaluating the Soil K(θ) Function Through The Instantaneous ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The soil conductivity function, at the reference plane, can be estimated under the following hypothesis [47]: (i) the volumetric water content at soil surface (θ0) was assumed to be equal to θ1; (ii) at the reference plane (z4), the volumetric water content (θ4) was assumed to be equal to θ3. Figure 5 illustrates the schematic layout of the SHYPROM system used in our laboratory experiments.…”
Section: Evaluating the Soil K(θ) Function Through The Instantaneous ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the application of irrigation water affects a wide variety of water transfer processes, such as surface runoff, infiltration and water loss below the root zone (Bachmann et al, 2006), whose magnitude depends fundamentally on soil h(θ) and K(θ) relationships, that must therefore be precisely determined in order to quantitatively analyze these processes (Villagra et al, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para uma camada de solo homogêneo, cada valor de potencial mátrico se relaciona com um conteúdo de água correspondente e esta relação, conhecida como curva de retenção, é característica de cada solo, pois a distribuição dos raios dos poros varia de solo para solo: a retenção da água no solo depende assim da composição granulométrica e do arranjamento estrutural do solo (HILLEL, 2004 Não existem estudos que tratam da distância entre os pontos de medidas, sendo que os valores utilizados normalmente variam de 0,20 até 0,40 cm (CADIMA et al, 1980;CINTRA et al, 2000;HUTCHINSON;BOND, 2001;VILLAGRA et al, 1994;VOLPE et al, 1988;), sendo que Hillel (2004) φ o potencial mátrico em m de água, H a leitura do tensiômetro feita a partir do nível de mercúrio na cuba, em m de mercúrio, h c a distância vertical do nível de mercúrio na cuba à superfície do solo no momento da leitura, em m de água e Z a profundidade de instalação da cápsula, em m de água.…”
Section: O Movimento Da áGua No Solounclassified
“…Em outras palavras, com o tamanho de cápsulas utilizado, pode-se dizer que a Figura 9), obtendo-se coeficientes de determinação ao redor de 0,98 demonstrando o excelente ajuste dos dados. O mesmo procedimento foi adotado porVillagra et al, (1994) obtendo coeficientes de determinação da mesma ordem de grandeza. O tempo inicial de redistribuição foi considerado 0,1 hora para que os cálculos pudessem ser feitos.…”
unclassified