2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12917-018-1716-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Field application of an indirect gE ELISA on pooled milk samples for the control of IBR in free and marker vaccinated dairy herds

Abstract: BackgroundThe aim of the present study was to assess the reliability of a new strategy for monitoring the serological response against Bovine Herpesvirus 1 (BoHV1), the causative agent of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis (IBR). Bulk milk samples have already been identified as cost effective diagnostic matrices for monitoring purposes. Nevertheless, most eradication programs are still based on individual standard assays. In a region of northwestern Italy (Piedmont), the voluntary eradication program for IBR h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the multiple-epitope recombinant protein was free of other BoHV-1 glycoproteins, such as gE and gG; thus, it could be considered a marker vaccine or used to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals. Vaccination of cowherds with the recombinant protein combined with gE or gG antibodies in the ELISA kit can contribute to the prevention and control of diseases associated with BoHV-1 infection in cattle herds (Colitti et al 2018;Sauerbrei and Wutzler 2004), especially in countries and regions where such infection remains a serious threat to the cow industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the multiple-epitope recombinant protein was free of other BoHV-1 glycoproteins, such as gE and gG; thus, it could be considered a marker vaccine or used to differentiate infected from vaccinated animals. Vaccination of cowherds with the recombinant protein combined with gE or gG antibodies in the ELISA kit can contribute to the prevention and control of diseases associated with BoHV-1 infection in cattle herds (Colitti et al 2018;Sauerbrei and Wutzler 2004), especially in countries and regions where such infection remains a serious threat to the cow industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the commercial blocking ELISAs are used to detect specific antibodies against glycoprotein B (gB-ELISA) or gE (gE-ELISA) of BoHV-1, and they can be used in individual or pooled samples [ 21 ]. However, in IBR-free farms or marker-vaccinated herds, the blocking gE-ELISA only allows discrimination between infected and immunised animals with gE-deleted markers [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In the last 20 years, commercial blocking ELISAs, using both serum and milk samples, have been developed by different companies; however, the blocking ELISAs using milk samples are discouraged because of the chance of obtaining false positives [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in IBR-free farms or marker-vaccinated herds, the blocking gE-ELISA only allows discrimination between infected and immunised animals with gE-deleted markers [ 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. In the last 20 years, commercial blocking ELISAs, using both serum and milk samples, have been developed by different companies; however, the blocking ELISAs using milk samples are discouraged because of the chance of obtaining false positives [ 22 ]. Therefore, few diagnostic tests on milk samples are commercially available for the surveillance or eradication of IBR programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since recombinant gE expressed in mammalian system has been successfully used in an indirect ELISA for the detection of IgG against the BoHV1gE on pooled milk samples for an IBR surveillance program in a region of north-west Italy (Piedmont) (Bertolotti et al, 2015;Muratore et al, 2017;Colitti et al, 2018), the development of a stable system for the high-yield expression of this protein, would represent a significant advance in the development of tools for IBR disease control. This study was of relevance to develop the technique from its proof of concept to more specific diagnostic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%