2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fidelity to foraging sites after long migrations

Abstract: Patterns of animal movement associated with foraging lie at the heart of many ecological studies and often animals face decisions of staying in an environment they know versus relocating to new sites. The lack of knowledge of new foraging sites means there is risk associated with a decision to relocate (e.g. poor foraging) as well as a potential benefit (e.g. improved foraging). Using a unique long‐term satellite tracking dataset for several sea turtle species, combined with capture–mark–recapture data extendi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
6
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous telemetry studies (Dujon et al, 2018) and long-term direct in-water observations confirm high utilization of this part of the bay by residents (Papafitsoros and Schofield, 2016). Fidelity to foraging sites has been widely recorded in sea turtle species (Limpus et al, 1992;Broderick et al, 2007;Rees et al, 2013;Shimada et al, 2020). Other species also exhibit high fidelity to certain foraging or breeding locations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous telemetry studies (Dujon et al, 2018) and long-term direct in-water observations confirm high utilization of this part of the bay by residents (Papafitsoros and Schofield, 2016). Fidelity to foraging sites has been widely recorded in sea turtle species (Limpus et al, 1992;Broderick et al, 2007;Rees et al, 2013;Shimada et al, 2020). Other species also exhibit high fidelity to certain foraging or breeding locations (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, 0.1 to 9% of immature green turtles are recaptured in sites different from where they were marked (usually tens to hundreds of km apart), thus possibly using several foraging grounds (Bjorndal et al, 2005;Colman et al, 2015;Gallo et al, 2006;Godley et al, 2003;Moncada et al, 2006;Patrício et al, 2011;Senko et al, 2010). Foraging sites philopatry has been evidenced in several species of sea turtles and across lifestages, with some adults returning after breeding migrations to the foraging areas they already used as immatures (Shimada et al, 2020). Green turtles may maintain tight fidelity to foraging grounds for multiple reasons (Broderick et al, 2007;Moran and Bjorndal, 2007;Shimada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Long-term and Year-round Residencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foraging sites philopatry has been evidenced in several species of sea turtles and across lifestages, with some adults returning after breeding migrations to the foraging areas they already used as immatures (Shimada et al, 2020). Green turtles may maintain tight fidelity to foraging grounds for multiple reasons (Broderick et al, 2007;Moran and Bjorndal, 2007;Shimada et al, 2020). They seem to adopt a low-risk strategy, ensuring their long-term survival by staying in familiar environments (Schofield et al, 2010;Shimada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Long-term and Year-round Residencymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations