2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1607.01778
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feynman Path Integrals Over Entangled States

A. G. Green,
C. A. Hooley,
J. Keeling
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, 3 is the MPS tensor. A tensor of bond order D and local Hilbert space dimension D is represented by an SU (dD) matrix following [13,[33][34][35][36] A σ ij = U (1⊗j),(σ⊗i) as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Acknowledgements and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2, 3 is the MPS tensor. A tensor of bond order D and local Hilbert space dimension D is represented by an SU (dD) matrix following [13,[33][34][35][36] A σ ij = U (1⊗j),(σ⊗i) as shown in Fig. 6.…”
Section: Acknowledgements and Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Canonicalisation at each step in a classical tensor network calculation amounts to reducing the tensors to isometries -a step that is not required in an explicitly unitary realisation. Moreover, the remaining elements of unitaries parametrise the tangent space of the variational manifold [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that we will not need to use any non-classical paths or histories; only eight histories need to be considered to get the proper answers. 5 The reason that there are eight histories is as follows: since the two photons are emitted in opposite directions (initially travelling along the solid lined paths or the dashed lined paths), there are only two initial possibilities, with amplitudes A and B for the solid and the dashed lines respectively. For each of these two cases, the photons must either transmit or reflect off a beamsplitter, ending at one detector in each device.…”
Section: Path Integral Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a single entangled state has no spatial representation, any of these "paths" would also have no possible spacetime representation. Approaches using such Hilbert space "paths" are common in the literature [3,4], and have even been extended to quantum field theory [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach remedies this issue because we integrate over Hilbert space which includes entangled states. An attempt to use paths in Hilbert space instead was previously proposed in [2], and a space-time based solution was recently discussed in [3]. Third, it is an example of a future-input-dependent formalism [4] and is hence a starting point to solve the measurement problem, as laid out in [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%