2001
DOI: 10.1053/jpsu.2001.20034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fetal tissue engineering: Diaphragmatic replacement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
0
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
57
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Tal como indica Fauza et al, dichas matrices acelulares son insuficientes por si solas, para la reparación de la pared abdominal (34), por lo que se hace necesario disponer de células (autólo-gas, alogénicas o xenogénicas), que se cultiven sobre ellas junto con distintas moléculas bioactivas que estimulen su desarrollo (5).…”
Section: Terapias Basadas En Técnicas De Ingeniería Tisu-larunclassified
“…Tal como indica Fauza et al, dichas matrices acelulares son insuficientes por si solas, para la reparación de la pared abdominal (34), por lo que se hace necesario disponer de células (autólo-gas, alogénicas o xenogénicas), que se cultiven sobre ellas junto con distintas moléculas bioactivas que estimulen su desarrollo (5).…”
Section: Terapias Basadas En Técnicas De Ingeniería Tisu-larunclassified
“…Using our index condition as an example, diaphragmatic reconstruction might be undertaken using a collagen matrix, seeded with native fibrous or muscular cells. Fauza et al (2001) already suggested this 10 years ago, hoping this would create a more functional substitute than the inert synthetic grafts currently in use (Kunisaki et al, 2006). These strategies may also be used to create a matrix for stimulating fetal membrane healing (Ochsenbein-Köble et al, 2007;Mallik et al, 2007).…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lai et al (2003) had proven that scaffolds covered with cells had better mechanical properties than acellular/non-seeded scaffolds in body wall repair using small intestinal submucosa seeded with cells. Fauza et al (2001) had also reported acellular collagen-based matrix alone may be insufficient scaffold for abdominal wall reconstruction. However, in our study none of the treatment groups, in both types of scaffolds have showed pouching and distension appearance of the abdominal wall, rather various degree of tissue regeneration was noticed, which was evidenced by graft opacity, and overwhelming blood vessels, fatty tissues, fibrous tissue and neo-peritoneum was observed in myoblast seeded groups of both type of scaffolds at 30 days of post-implantation ( Figure 14).…”
Section: Macroscopic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%