2016
DOI: 10.4054/demres.2016.35.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fertility progression in Germany: An analysis using flexible nonparametric cure survival models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using version v31.0, Bremhorst et al . () studied the transition to the second and third birth. Only one‐child and two‐child German women living in West Germany who were still of childbearing age (17–49 years) between 1984 and 2013 were considered in the sample.…”
Section: Application To Fertility Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Using version v31.0, Bremhorst et al . () studied the transition to the second and third birth. Only one‐child and two‐child German women living in West Germany who were still of childbearing age (17–49 years) between 1984 and 2013 were considered in the sample.…”
Section: Application To Fertility Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main interest of Bremhorst et al . () was to study the effect of the educational attainments of the women and of their partners on the probability and on the timing of an additional child. In their analyses, the educational levels were frozen at the onset of the process (i.e.…”
Section: Application To Fertility Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the inclusion of baseline covariates, we follow Bremhorst and Lambert () and Bremhorst et al. () with the log‐linear model for the cure probability and a (flexible) proportional hazards (PH) model to complete the specification of the event time distribution. The baseline survival function, S0false(yifalse)=exp0true0yih0false(tfalse)dt=exp0true0yiexp0truek=1Kbkfalse(tfalse)ϕkdt,is specified through the log of the baseline hazard h0false(tfalse) (Rosenberg, ) using a cubic B‐spline basis {bkfalse(·false):k=1,,K} on (0,ttrueprefixmax) where tmax denotes the considered minimum follow‐up duration required to ensure that an event‐free subject by that time will not experience the event of interest.…”
Section: The Conditional Promotion Time Cure Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Y=min{Wi:i=1,,N} is the time required to diagnose a relapse and it has an improper survival distribution truerightSp(y)=leftprefixPr(Y>y)=prefixPr(N=0)+prefixPr(W1>y,,WN>y,N1)==leftnormaleθ+N=1+(1F(y))NnormaleθθNN!=expfalse{θF(y)false}.The proportion of ‘cured’ subjects is given by Prfalse(N=0false)=Spfalse(+false)=expfalse(θfalse). But the preceding biological motivation is not essential to come up with the proposed expression for the population survival function Spfalse(tfalse), opening its use in non‐medical areas such as demography (Bremhorst, Kreyenfeld, & Lambert, , ). Indeed, if a fraction of the population is really “cured” or “nonsusceptible” (to experience the event of interest), then the underlying cumulative hazard Λ(t) has a finite positive limiting value (say θ), yielding the former expression for Spfalse(tfalse) with the normalized cumulative hazard F(t)=Λ(t)/θ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%