2011
DOI: 10.1109/tcpmt.2011.2143411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ferrite LTCC-Based Antennas for Tunable SoP Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, at 2.4 GHz and 4 GHz, the loss tangent values are 0.13 and 0.015 respectively. This is due to the low field losses of the magnetic material in the absence of the magnetic bias [21]. However, the loss tangent value at frequencies above fm is in the acceptable range.…”
Section: B Microwave Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, at 2.4 GHz and 4 GHz, the loss tangent values are 0.13 and 0.015 respectively. This is due to the low field losses of the magnetic material in the absence of the magnetic bias [21]. However, the loss tangent value at frequencies above fm is in the acceptable range.…”
Section: B Microwave Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Magnetization frequency is important as the ferrites do not show any low-field losses after this frequency [9]. It is recommended that the center frequency of a microwave device should be higher than the magnetization frequency of the medium to avoid any low field losses [21]. In order to estimate the loss of the ink, it is characterized for its linewidth (H =100 Oe at 3 GHz) using a half wavelength micrsotrip line resonator fabricated on Duroid 5880 board [22].…”
Section: A Magnetostatic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stack is made of ESL-40012 ferrite tape system [20]. This tape has a r ≈ 14.6, tan δ ≈ 5 × 10 −3 and a saturation magnetization (4πM s ) of 4000 Gauss that results in a magnetization frequency (f m ) of about 11.2 GHz [17]. The material is operated in the partially magnetized state (0 ≤ M ≤ M s ) to minimize the bias field required.…”
Section: Design and Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of external magnets creates large demagnetization effects at the boundary, rendering the design inefficient. Alternately, a multilayer substrate such as ferrite LTCC (Low Temperature Co-fired Ceramic) with embedded windings can be employed to bias the ferrite, thus negating the need for large and inefficient external magnets [2]. Further reduction in the applied bias fields is possible, if the antenna is tuned in the partially magnetized state of the ferrite substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%