Feeding value of pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i>, L.) 2. Nutritional value in the pig

Grosjean, François; Bastianelli, Denis; Bourdillon, A.; Cerneau, P.; Jondreville, Catherine; Peyronnet, Corinne

doi:10.1017/s1357729800033063

Cited by 20 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…PdE was not correlated with predicted ileal digestibility of protein (pdN), nor with tannin or nutrient content in seeds. Grosjean et al (1998a) reported that apparent digestibility of energy in pigs was 89%) for white-and 81%o for coloured-flowered pea. The lower pdE value of the Zuraw cultivar was undoubtedly due to the high tannin content.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Pea production increased considerably in Europe and many research programmes were established to study the composition of different types and cultivars of pea and relationships between composition criteria and nutritional value of pea (Bastianelli et al, 1998;Grosjean et al, 1998aGrosjean et al, ,b, 1999. In Poland, among seventeen registered cultivars of pea grown on light soils, twelve (Wiatr, 1999) belongs to a colour-flowered (P. sativum L. ssp.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics

Smulikowska

Pastuszewska²,

Święch³

et al. 2001

J. Anim. Feed Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nine Polish varieties of pea (P. sativum L.) differing in flower colour, from white to purple, were evaluated for chemical and amino acid composition and in vitro for predicted ileal digestibility of protein (pdN) and predicted digestibility of energy (pdE) for pigs. In selected varieties differing in tannin content the apparent metabolizable energy value corrected for zero N balance (AME N ), apparent digestibility of protein and fat and effect of enzymes reducing viscosity of digesta on this parameters were estimated in chickens; apparent metabolizable energy value (AME), true digestibility and biological value of protein was determined in rats.Tannin content had most pronounced negative effect on protein digestibility in chicken (r= -0.93; PO.05) and rats (r= -0.89; PO.05), pdN for pigs (r= -0.98; PO.001) as well as AME N for chicken (r= -0.99; PO.001) and AME for rats (r= -0.95; PO.01), while nutrient content in peas had no significant effect on measured parameters. AME N values of pea did not depend on supplementation of pea-containing diet with xylanase.Seeds of coloured-flowered cultivars, which are rich in tannins are less effectively utilized by monogastric animals than white-flowered ones. The degree of decline in nutrient utilization depends on tannin content in the seeds, which is correlated with the colour of the flowers.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics

Smulikowska

Pastuszewska²,

Święch³

et al. 2001

J. Anim. Feed Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pea samples were analysed for TSW according to the standard method (AFNOR V 03-702 1988), for HULL according to the method of Munier-Jolain described by Grosjean et al (1998a) and for TIA according to the American Oil Chemists Society method (1983) with results expressed as UTI mg DM -1 allowing calculation of TIAP expressed as UTI mg CP -1 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Feed peas are used mainly for pigs and, for example, in France, peas represented 22% of the feedstuffs used by the feed industry for pigs between 1990 and 1997 (Bernicot et al 1998). This type of pea, which comes from white-flowered varieties (Bastianelli et al 1998), is more valuable for pigs than other peas, mainly due to the effects of tannins in round, colouredflowered varieties and the high amylose/amylopectine ratio in wrinkled varieties (Grosjean et al 1998a.). However, feed peas exhibit TIA, which may vary between 2 and 15 UTI mg DM -1 (Grosjean et al1993) depending on variety and, to a lesser extent, environmental growing conditions (Wang et al 1998), although most commercial feed peas have TIA lower than 4 UTI mg DM -1 (Grosjean et al 1993).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids of feed peas with different trypsin inhibitor activity in pigs

Grosjean¹,

Jondreville²,

Williatte-Hazouard³

et al. 2000

Can. J. Anim. Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

. 2000. Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids of feed peas with different trypsin inhibitor activity in pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 80: 643-652. Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids was measured in pigs fed 13 round, tannin-free peas samples and related to the following physical, chemical and biological characteristics of these samples: thousand-seed weight, proportion of hulls, starch, fibre, crude protein, ether extract and ash contents, trypsin inhibitor activity and trypsin inhibitor activity per unit of crude protein (TIAP). Each pea sample was included in a diet containing starch, sucrose, minerals and vitamins and fed to four barrows (50 to 100 kg) fitted with an endto-end ileo-rectal anastomosis. Standardised ileal protein and amino acid digestibilities, except for alanine of peas decreased linearly with increasing TIAP (P < 0.01) and was not affected by fiber content. For example standardized ileal digestibilities values (%) decreased by -0.1975, -0.1617, -0.2171, -0.2630, -0.2029 and -0.3536 per unit of TIAP (expressed in unit of trypsin inhibited per milligram crude protein), respectively, for crude protein and lysine, threonine, methionine, cystine and tryptophan.

show abstract

“…Hlödversson (1987) determinou valores de energia digestível para o grão de ervilha variando de 3752 a 3920 kcal/kg MS, Fan & Sauer (1994) encontraram valores que variaram entre 3346 e 3442 kcal/kg MS, enquanto Grosjean et al (1998) encontraram valor de 3905 kcal/kg MS. Os resultados revisados apresentaram valores de EM em torno de 5% abaixo da ED, diferença correspondente a perdas urinárias esperadas em dietas produzidas com milho e farelo de soja segundo o NRC (1998). No presente estudo, a menor diferença foi de 6,17% para a EM.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Avaliação nutricional do grão de ervilha forrageira (Pisum sativum) em dietas para suínos em crescimento

Vieira

Metz

Bartels³

et al. 2003

R. Bras. Zootec.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO -Dietas à base de milho e farelo de soja, contendo níveis crescentes de grão de ervilha forrageira (0, 20 e 40%), foram formuladas com os objetivos de avaliar o valor nutricional deste grão, sub-espécie hortense, cultivar Alfetta e de determinar os valores de energia digestível e metabolizável aparentes do mesmo. Todas dietas foram fornecidas a 18 suínos machos castrados híbridos comerciais com peso médio inicial de 40 kg. O estudo teve duração de quatro semanas, com avaliação semanal do consumo de alimento, ganho de peso e conversão alimentar dos animais. Ao mesmo tempo, foram feitas coletas de fezes e de urina excretadas para avaliação de variáveis de metabolismo. Os animais consumindo as dietas com níveis crescentes de ervilha apresentaram ganho de peso, conversão alimentar, digestibilidade e retenção de nitrogênio similares aos da dieta testemunha sem ervilha. Os valores de energia digestível e de energia metabolizável aparentes, determinados para o grão de ervilha, foram de 3.968 e de 3.723 kcal/kg MS, respectivamente. A avaliação das respostas deste estudo sustenta a possibilidade de inclusão do grão de ervilha forrageira em dietas para suínos em crescimento em até 40%, sem prejuízo ao desempenho, quando comparadas com fórmulas tradicionais com milho e farelo de soja.Palavras-chave: ervilha, energia digestível, energia metabolizável, digestibilidade da proteína, retenção de nitrogênio Nutritional Evaluation of Ground Pea (Pisum sativum) in Diets for Growing PigsABSTRACT -Corn and soybean meal based diets with increasing levels of ground peas, sub-species hortense cultivar Alfetta (0, 20 and 40%), were formulated to evaluate the nutritional value of this ingredient with 18 castrated male pigs of commercial hybrids averaging 40 kg. The study also aimed to determine the apparent digestible and metabolizable energy and nitrogen retentions of peas. A total period of four weeks was used in which body weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion and amount of feces and urine were evaluated. The results demonstrated an overall performance of animals fed diets with increasing levels of green peas similar to those fed the control diet without peas. These results were consistent with the outcome from the metabolism assay, which demonstrated digestibility and nitrogen retention similar to the control diet. Digestible and metabolizable energy values of 3,968 and 3,723 kcal/kg were calculated. Results clearly indicate the possibility of inclusion up to 40% ground peas in the growing pigs feeding, without any constraint on animal performance.Key Words: digestible energy, metabolizable energy, nitrogen retention, pea, pigs, protein digestibility IntroduçãoA ervilha forrageira (Pisum sativum) é uma leguminosa não oleaginosa que apresenta níveis de proteína bruta ao redor de 20%. Esta planta tem características agronômicas apropriadas à pequena propriedade familiar, pois, além de possuir características importantes para a conservação e fertilidade do solo, é cultivada no inverno, quando muitas áreas agrícolas permanecem...

show abstract

Feeding value of pea (Pisum sativum, L.) 2. Nutritional value in the pig

Cited by 20 publications

References 9 publications

Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics

Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics

Ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids of feed peas with different trypsin inhibitor activity in pigs

Avaliação nutricional do grão de ervilha forrageira (Pisum sativum) em dietas para suínos em crescimento

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About