2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feeding type affects microplastic ingestion in a coastal invertebrate community

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
119
1
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 344 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
119
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example the blue mussels inhabiting the brackish waters of the Baltic Sea (Mytilus trossulus) are markedly smaller than the blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) inhabiting North Sea and the Danish straits (Väinölä and Strelkov, 2011). Moreover, experimental work with the local zooplankton and benthic communities in the northern Baltic Sea (Setälä et al, 2014(Setälä et al, , 2016 have already shown the efficiency of planktonic and benthic animals to ingest relatively small plastic microspheres of 10 μm in size, which are in the size range of their natural food, phytoplankton and small zooplankton. To better estimate the hazards that microscopic litter particles pose to marine organisms, it is evident that also the smaller fractions should be included in the sampling protocols (Syberg et al, 2015).…”
Section: Applicability Of the Results For Assessing Harm Of Microlittmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example the blue mussels inhabiting the brackish waters of the Baltic Sea (Mytilus trossulus) are markedly smaller than the blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) inhabiting North Sea and the Danish straits (Väinölä and Strelkov, 2011). Moreover, experimental work with the local zooplankton and benthic communities in the northern Baltic Sea (Setälä et al, 2014(Setälä et al, , 2016 have already shown the efficiency of planktonic and benthic animals to ingest relatively small plastic microspheres of 10 μm in size, which are in the size range of their natural food, phytoplankton and small zooplankton. To better estimate the hazards that microscopic litter particles pose to marine organisms, it is evident that also the smaller fractions should be included in the sampling protocols (Syberg et al, 2015).…”
Section: Applicability Of the Results For Assessing Harm Of Microlittmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a laboratory study designed to mimic a coastal ecosystem, Setälä et al. () compared the ingestion of microplastics in marine invertebrates with different feeding habits (bivalves, free‐swimming crustaceans and benthic, deposit‐feeding organisms). Microbeads (10 μm) were ingested by all organisms, with the highest quantities taken up in bivalves ( Mytilus tossulus and Macoma balthica ).…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, particle fate in exposure systems is seldom investigated thoroughly. In some exposure studies of marine invertebrates particle ingestion has been quantified, most commonly by counting particles in animal tissues or feces (e.g., Watts et al ; Setälä et al ); however, the fate of the remaining particles is rarely determined. This hampers the understanding of how the particles behave and where they end up in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%