2016
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feedback control of unstable flows: a direct modelling approach using the Eigensystem Realisation Algorithm

Abstract: Obtaining low-order models for unstable flows in a systematic and computationally tractable manner has been a long-standing challenge. In this study, we show that the Eigensystem Realisation Algorithm (ERA) can be applied directly to unstable flows, and that the resulting models can be used to design robust stabilising feedback controllers. We consider the unstable flow around a D-shaped body, equipped with body-mounted actuators, and sensors located either in the wake or on the base of the body. A linear mode… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another approach is the use of system identification methods in which low order models are obtained from a sample of input-output measurements. In particular the eigensystem realisation algorithm (ERA) (Juang & Pappa 1985) was recently used to construct reduced order models for fluid flows (Ma et al 2011;Illingworth et al 2012;Dadfar et al 2013;Semeraro et al 2013;Belson et al 2013;Flinois & Morgans 2016). ERA is based on the impulse response measurements and does not require prior knowledge of the high order system.…”
Section: Model Reduction and Localised Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Another approach is the use of system identification methods in which low order models are obtained from a sample of input-output measurements. In particular the eigensystem realisation algorithm (ERA) (Juang & Pappa 1985) was recently used to construct reduced order models for fluid flows (Ma et al 2011;Illingworth et al 2012;Dadfar et al 2013;Semeraro et al 2013;Belson et al 2013;Flinois & Morgans 2016). ERA is based on the impulse response measurements and does not require prior knowledge of the high order system.…”
Section: Model Reduction and Localised Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ERA is based on the impulse response measurements and does not require prior knowledge of the high order system. It is shown in Ma et al (2011) that ERA can theoretically obtain the same reduced-order models as BPOD and in Flinois & Morgans (2016) it is shown that ERA can also directly be applied to globally unstable flows.…”
Section: Model Reduction and Localised Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Pastoor et al [24] used both slope-seeking control and a gain/phase-shift controller targeting synchronisation of the two shear layers, achieving a 15% drag reduction of the same experimental body. Stalnov et al [25,26] experimentally targeted reduced wake unsteadiness due to vortex shedding, using a phase-locked loop and reducing unsteadiness in the wake, while Flinois and Morgans [27] achieved full wake stabilisation at low Reynolds number, using balanced models derived from the unstable impulse response.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%