2018
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2017.2773367
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feature Profiles from Attribute Filtering for Classification of Remote Sensing Images

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For attribute filtering, we exploited two attributes including the area and the moment of inertia. Ten area thresholds were adopted for the Reykjavik data as proposed by several papers [20], [39], [40]. For the Pavia University data, fourteen thresholds were automatically computed according to [24].…”
Section: B Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For attribute filtering, we exploited two attributes including the area and the moment of inertia. Ten area thresholds were adopted for the Reykjavik data as proposed by several papers [20], [39], [40]. For the Pavia University data, fourteen thresholds were automatically computed according to [24].…”
Section: B Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have revisited the principles of APs [1] and FPs [3] with the aim to conduct a comparative study of their performance on remote sensing image classification. Our experiments have taken into account various tree structures for their generation including the component, in- clusion and partition trees.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to better characterize the region/object enclosed by the CC (i.e. which corresponds to a filtered tree's node), node features are extracted instead of the node's gray level in the recently proposed FPs [3] . Figure 1 provides an overview of how the generation of FPs differs from the standard AP technique.…”
Section: Feature Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A major drawback of such a strategy is the difficulty to reconstruct the filtered image (or SITS here) since there could be several different vectors (or time series) being considered as equivalent and thus it is not possible to choose among these ties if they correspond to the retained maxima or minima. Nevertheless, we can avoid the reconstruction phase, similarly to the concept of feature profiles (FP) [10].…”
Section: Orderingmentioning
confidence: 99%