2013
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-405539-1.00001-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FCS in STED Microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The general approach for STED-FCS is the same as for traditional FCS. Only it also requires a STED laser, red-shifted in wavelength relative to the fluorescence emission of the specific probe, optical elements for focusing the STED laser to a donut pattern with a zero intensity foci in the middle, and exquisite co-alignment in space and time of the excitation and STED lasers [28, 82]. With this approach it has been possible to tune the observation spot from a diffraction-limited value of around 250 nm and down to  ≈15 nm by adjustment of the STED laser power [28, 29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The general approach for STED-FCS is the same as for traditional FCS. Only it also requires a STED laser, red-shifted in wavelength relative to the fluorescence emission of the specific probe, optical elements for focusing the STED laser to a donut pattern with a zero intensity foci in the middle, and exquisite co-alignment in space and time of the excitation and STED lasers [28, 82]. With this approach it has been possible to tune the observation spot from a diffraction-limited value of around 250 nm and down to  ≈15 nm by adjustment of the STED laser power [28, 29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to an accessible time resolution of STED-FCS for focal radii measurements of 40  ⩽   ω x , y   ⩽  250 nm of 60 µ s  ⩽   τ D   ⩽  2.3 ms in multi-lamellar lipid layers. The primary error in the STED-FCS data analysis originates from the measurement precision of the lateral radius of the observation spots where typical measurement errors are around 10%, resulting in final errors of the diffusion coefficient of a similar range [28, 29, 82]. The general advantage of this STED-FCS measurement mode is that it mainly relies on comparing relative values (i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To perform VLS-FCS, a calibrated iris diaphragm was added to the parallel path of the 488 nm excitation beam, midway between a parallel beam expander and the objective lens, in order to control the width of the beam. The size of the observation volume was increased by incremental reduction of the iris diameter concentric to the optical axis (12, 4, 2.5, 1.25, 0.9 and 0.5 mm) and by selecting confocal pinholes with incrementally higher diameters (50,75,100,150,200, and 300 µm). This resulted in observation volume radii evenly spaced on a logarithmic scale, w 0 0.3 to 2.5 µm.…”
Section: Vls-fcs Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For fluorophores restricted to two-dimensional diffusion, the observation lengthscale can also be changed by placing the diffusion plane slightly out of focus 70 , or by using the information captured in time-lapsed images [71][72][73] . Recently, the possibility to extend the range of FCS measurements to sub-diffraction observation volumes has been demonstrated by a number of groups, using stimulated emission depletion 44,49,74,75 , zero-mode waveguides 76 or near-field optical probes 77,78 . Beyond the range of accessible observation volume sizes, our study emphasizes the importance of data quality, since it determines the range of lengthscales around w 0 for which the numerical inversion procedure to recover the MSD can be done.…”
Section: On the Importance Of Characterizing Complex Diffusion Procesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), stimulated emission depletion (STED) far-field fluorescence nanoscopy, reversible saturable optical (fluorescence) transitions (RESOLFT), reversible saturable optical (fluorescence) transitions (RESOLFT), ground state depletion microscopy followed by individual molecule return (GSDIM), stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM), or photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) [2,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Accordingly the generally very high rate for in-plane lateral diffusion of membrane/nano-domain constituents can be accurately tracked by these methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%