2007 25th International Conference on Computer Design 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iccd.2007.4601947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-based alternate test of RF components

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [5] a genetic algorithm is used to carefully craft a test stimulus such that the test response will be highly correlated with specification performances, reducing prediction error. In [2] the authors employ guard-banding to judiciously apply full specification test to devices where pass/fail outcomes are uncertain.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [5] a genetic algorithm is used to carefully craft a test stimulus such that the test response will be highly correlated with specification performances, reducing prediction error. In [2] the authors employ guard-banding to judiciously apply full specification test to devices where pass/fail outcomes are uncertain.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the training set of devices for developing the mapping using supervised learning must include devices across as many process corners as possible. In practice, a defect filter [6,7] is used to first determine if the DUT specifications can be predicted accurately from its response (the specifications of devices outside the performance domain of devices in the training set are not predicted accurately by the alternate test procedure). If not, then standard specification tests cation…”
Section: Figure 1: Alternate Test Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…slow convergence, low classification accuracy), which need to be improved. Currently, the SVDD is focused on by the three aspects [18][19][20][21][22][23]: (1) the deformation of the normal SVDD model, such as density-induced SVDD; (2) optimum selection method of training set and increase of computation speed, such as incremental leaning method; and (3) the selection of SVDD parameters, including the kernel function and kernel parameters, such as cross validation and path algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%