2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Future clinical long-term follow-ups are necessary to confirm the current in vitro results. The effect of the connection and abutment on the fatigue strength and assembly change is important for the maintaining of the interface, which wear is not always similar between titanium and zirconia materials (28). In addition, the type of abutment material and the connection design may affected the fit and the sealing capability of the different abutments (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future clinical long-term follow-ups are necessary to confirm the current in vitro results. The effect of the connection and abutment on the fatigue strength and assembly change is important for the maintaining of the interface, which wear is not always similar between titanium and zirconia materials (28). In addition, the type of abutment material and the connection design may affected the fit and the sealing capability of the different abutments (29).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current results suggest that a large microgap or poor seating of the milled abutment, along with its high Young modulus, may result in deformation of the body of the implant (33). Sen et al (34) published that abutment material and connection design affect the fatigue survival of the implant-abutment assembly and that milled abutments have less resistance to failure than machined abutments, its results reported marginal misfit values in the range of 2.7-4.0μm for machined abutments and 1.8-5.3μm for machined abutments. Baixe et al (35) reported the size of the microgap in the range of 0.25 to 18.93μm for milled abutments with tri-channel connection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tlenek cyrkonu, choć technologiczne możliwy do zastosowania, w praktyce ze względu na swoje właściwości mechaniczne, a w szczególności dużą twardość mógłby doprowadzić do zniszczenia struktury powierzchni implantu. 15,16 Tytanowe bazy zwiększają wytrzymałość łączników cyrkonowych. 16,17 Połączenie tytanowej bazy z elementem cyrkonowym wymaga odpowiedniego przygotowania powierzchni cyrkonu poprzez piaskownie i bonding obu powierzchni oraz zastosowanie odpowiedniego cementu.…”
Section: Omówienieunclassified
“…15,16 Tytanowe bazy zwiększają wytrzymałość łączników cyrkonowych. 16,17 Połączenie tytanowej bazy z elementem cyrkonowym wymaga odpowiedniego przygotowania powierzchni cyrkonu poprzez piaskownie i bonding obu powierzchni oraz zastosowanie odpowiedniego cementu. Wiadomo również, że połączenia cementu z tytanem są silniejsze niż z tlenkiem cyrkonu.…”
Section: Omówienieunclassified