2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue behaviour of light alloys with ultrafine grain structure produced by severe plastic deformation: An overview

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
166
0
7

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
14
166
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in comparison with the CG structure, a small grain size can potentially result in more homogeneous deformation, which can retard crack nucleation by reducing stress concentrations and ultimately raise the fatigue limit of the UFG structure. This has been demonstrated by other studies on ECAPed copper structures on low and high cycle fatigue (Hanlon et al, 2005;Estrin & Vinogradov, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Also, in comparison with the CG structure, a small grain size can potentially result in more homogeneous deformation, which can retard crack nucleation by reducing stress concentrations and ultimately raise the fatigue limit of the UFG structure. This has been demonstrated by other studies on ECAPed copper structures on low and high cycle fatigue (Hanlon et al, 2005;Estrin & Vinogradov, 2010).…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, a survey of the available literature on the fatigue of NC metals reveals that fatigue failure still occurs for NC metals, often with nothing more than a modest improvement in performance over CG metals. [26,27] Perhaps the explanation for the lack of dramatic improvements in fatigue performance is related to the instability of NC grain structures, which are known to evolve even during storage at room temperature. [28] Previous experimental observations of NC grain growth during plastic deformation, [29,30] indentation experiments [31] and as a result of fatigue loading [14,32] warrant serious consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix material shows the highest thresholds and also a strong load ratio dependency. This can be explained by the well-known effect of the grain size on the crack growth at different load ratios [11][12][13]15,35]. The amount of crack deflection is constant for all load ratios, whereas the effect of roughness induced crack closure is minimized by increasing the load ratio.…”
Section: Fatigue Crack Propagationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These investigations show the well-known effect of the grain or particle size on the fatigue crack growth. The grain refinement through ECAP leads to a minimized amount of crack deflection and roughness-induced crack closure, which results in higher crack propagation rates and, therefore, in minor thresholds [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. In reinforced materials, particle sizes larger than 2-5 µm have a contrary effect on crack propagation: by increasing crack deflection and roughness-induced crack closure, crack propagation rates are lowered [19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%