2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07114-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fate of the intervertebral disc and analysis of its risk factors following high-energy traumatic thoracic and lumbar fractures: MRI results of minimum five years after injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were assigned to types A and B in accordance with AO fracture classification, 15 as well as to type I, type II, and type III based on endplate injury classification. 16 Patients are classified as type I, II, III, and IV, which type I and II are considered well healed, and type III and IV were considered poorly healed. 17 A load-sharing classification (LSC) score was performed following the extent of vertebral injury, displacement of fracture fragments, and correction of kyphosis as observed on computed tomography (CT).…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients were assigned to types A and B in accordance with AO fracture classification, 15 as well as to type I, type II, and type III based on endplate injury classification. 16 Patients are classified as type I, II, III, and IV, which type I and II are considered well healed, and type III and IV were considered poorly healed. 17 A load-sharing classification (LSC) score was performed following the extent of vertebral injury, displacement of fracture fragments, and correction of kyphosis as observed on computed tomography (CT).…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%