2014
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-3-347-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Moving Objects Detection Using iLBP Background Model

Abstract: ABSTRACT:In this paper a new approach for moving objects detection in video surveillance systems is proposed. It is based on iLBP (intensity local binary patterns) descriptor that combines the classic LBP (local binary patterns) and the multiple regressive pseudospectra model. The iLBP descriptor itself is considered together with computational algorithm that is based on the sign image representation. We show that motion analysis methods based on iLBP allow uniformly detecting objects that move with different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this, there could be a wrong pixel comparison result when intensity values of pixels differ drastically, but their LBP values are identical. To overcome this drawback, Vishnyakov et al (2014) propose an intensity LBP (iLBP) to build a fast background model is proposed in (Vishnyakov et al, 2014). It is defined as a collection of LBP descriptor values and intensity values of the image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this, there could be a wrong pixel comparison result when intensity values of pixels differ drastically, but their LBP values are identical. To overcome this drawback, Vishnyakov et al (2014) propose an intensity LBP (iLBP) to build a fast background model is proposed in (Vishnyakov et al, 2014). It is defined as a collection of LBP descriptor values and intensity values of the image.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, concluding remarks and some perspectives are drawn in Section 5. (Ojala et al, 2002) • 256 Modified LBP (Heikkilä and Pietikäinen, 2006) • • 256 CS-LBP (Heikkilä et al, 2009) • 16 STLBP (Shimada and Taniguchi, 2009) • • 256 εLBP • 256 Adaptive εLBP • 256 SCS-LBP (Xue et al, 2010) • • 16 SILTP (Liao et al, 2010) • 256 CS-LDP (Xue et al, 2011) • 16 SCBP (Xue et al, 2011) • 64 OCLBP (Lee et al, 2011) • 1536 Uniform LBP (Yuan et al, 2012) • 59 SALBP (Noh and Jeon, 2012) • 128 SLBP-AM (Yin et al, 2013) • • 256 LBSP (Bilodeau et al, 2013) • • 256 iLBP (Vishnyakov et al, 2014) • 256 CS-SILTP (Wu et al, 2014) • • 16 XCS-LBP (in this paper)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shimada et al [17] improved LBP operator to acquire Spatial‐Temporal LBP (STLBP) and handle long‐term or short‐term illumination changes employing a new hybrid background model, and then the STLBP was introduced to extract the coarse moving objects in the H.264 compression domain [18]. ε LBP [19] and i LBP [20] operators improve the traditional LBP operator and are applied to extract the local description of each pixel. Combining the strengths of robust illumination normalisation, the Local Ternary Pattern (LTP) operator [21], which is more discriminant and less sensitive to noise in uniform regions, was presented to eliminate most of the effects of changing illumination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%