Robotics: Science and Systems IX 2013
DOI: 10.15607/rss.2013.ix.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Interpolation and Time-Optimization on Implicit Contact Submanifolds

Abstract: Abstract-This paper presents a method for generating smooth, efficiently-executable trajectories for robots under contact constraints, such as those encountered in legged locomotion and object manipulation. It consists of two parts. The first is an efficient, robust method for constructing C1 interpolating paths between configuration/velocity states on implicit manifolds. The second is a robust time-scaling method that solves for a minimum-time parameterization using a novel convex programming formulation. Sim… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different grid sizes (N ) and number of degrees of freedom to optimize (DOF) were reported or tested. Next, in order to make a "formal" comparison -on the same computer and using the same programming language, we considered MINTOS (http://www.iu.edu/ ∼ motion/mintos/, last accessed December 2013), Hauser's recent C++ implementation of the convex optimization approach [8], which is, to our knowledge, the fastest implementation currently available. To exclude the robot dynamics computations -which are independent of the TOPP problem and whose execution times depend largely on the robot simulation software used, we considered "pure" velocity and acceleration bounds.…”
Section: Comparison With the Convex Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different grid sizes (N ) and number of degrees of freedom to optimize (DOF) were reported or tested. Next, in order to make a "formal" comparison -on the same computer and using the same programming language, we considered MINTOS (http://www.iu.edu/ ∼ motion/mintos/, last accessed December 2013), Hauser's recent C++ implementation of the convex optimization approach [8], which is, to our knowledge, the fastest implementation currently available. To exclude the robot dynamics computations -which are independent of the TOPP problem and whose execution times depend largely on the robot simulation software used, we considered "pure" velocity and acceleration bounds.…”
Section: Comparison With the Convex Optimization Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that all three families can be applied to a wide variety of robot dynamics and constraints, such as manipulators subject to torque bounds [13], humanoids subject to joint velocity and accelerations bounds [11], [8], mobile robots or humanoids subject to balance and friction constraints [14], [15], non-holonomic robots [16], etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Hauser (2013), a method that involves solving a series of linear programs is suggested, although this approach is for a smaller class of problems (only velocity and acceleration constraints).…”
Section: Downloaded By [Case Western Reserve University] At 15:03 04 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the desired path of the robot is already defined, a scalar path coordinate (θ(t)) can be used to represent robot position on the path [4][5][6][7]. The major advantage of the scalar path coordinate is that the high dimensional state-space model of the robotic system can be reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%