1988
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90472-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Field Echo imaging: An overview and contrast calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-ideal slice select profile may also be part of the reason for the observed signal difference (13). The effect of non-ideal slice select profile on the signal curves could be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Non-ideal slice select profile may also be part of the reason for the observed signal difference (13). The effect of non-ideal slice select profile on the signal curves could be seen from Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Those voxels are represented by a linear combination of both air and fluid classes and are underestimated in pseudo-CT. This effect has been previously described and is largely due to CSF flow effects 56 and a signal loss of a long T1 tissue acquired with a short repetition time MR sequence. 25 An approach to reduce this clustering error is to use the RF spoiling technique in the UTE-mDixon acquisition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The echo time was chosen 16.1 ms for which water and fat protons have opposed phases. The FFE sequence was an RF spoiled gradient e c ho sequence, which improves the T 1 image contrast Van der Meulen et al 1988. For the motion studies, signal acquisition was triggered on the respiration cycle using a respiration monitor with sensor Type MR 10, Graseby Medical Ltd, Watford, England in combination with the scanners triggering device.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%