“…The in vivo NIR fluorescence imaging represents an emerging biomedical imaging technique with well-established safety and methodology. , Compared to other methods for biological tissue imaging, NIR imaging offers substantial advantages. One notable advantage of NIR imaging is nonionizing radiation, which eliminates the risk of tissue damage, thereby enabling the possibilities of kinetic imaging. , The longer wavelengths of NIR fluorescence result in reduced light scattering and biomolecular absorption and can penetrate deep into tissues. , In addition, NIR imaging also benefits from the low autofluorescence exhibited by biological tissues at long wavelengths, ensuring a high signal-to-noise ratio within the organism. , Over the past decade, NIR fluorescence imaging has focused on traditional NIR-I imaging (700–900 nm), while recent advances have been made in the field of NIR-II imaging (1000–1700 nm). , By further reductions in scattering, absorption, and organismal autofluorescence, in vivo , NIR-II fluorescence imaging outperforms imaging in NIR-I imaging capabilities. − NIR-II imaging has been used for medical diagnosis, tumor therapy, and photothermal imaging. , However, near-infrared two-region sensors with stimulus-responsive properties are lacking, and such sensors are seldom applied to the detection of environmental substances.…”