2009
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1090.0264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Approaches to Improve the Robustness of a Railway Timetable

Abstract: Abstract. The Train Timetabling Problem (TTP) consists in finding a train schedule on a railway network that satisfies some operational constraints and maximizes some profit function which counts for the efficiency of the infrastructure usage. In practical cases, however, the maximization of the objective function is not enough and one calls for a robust solution that is capable of absorbing as much as possible delays/disturbances on the network. In this paper we propose and analyze computationally four differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fischetti et al [12] propose a light robustness approach to take robustness of a solution into account and at the same time maintain low computational times. On a medium sized network, the proposed approach results in two order of magnitude improvements for CPU time while maintaining almost the same solution quality.…”
Section: Literature On Robust Railway Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischetti et al [12] propose a light robustness approach to take robustness of a solution into account and at the same time maintain low computational times. On a medium sized network, the proposed approach results in two order of magnitude improvements for CPU time while maintaining almost the same solution quality.…”
Section: Literature On Robust Railway Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we remark that there exists a wide literature on capacity allocation issues in railway. For example, several models proposed in the literature aim to solving the scheduling problem focusing on a certain objective function under predefined constraints to optimality, such as periodic time windows constraints [5], or introduce stochastic disturbances [6]; Fischetti et al [7] focused on robustness improvement of a given solution; Ho et al [8], after remarking that multi-objective optimization approaches often end with feasible solutions because of the constraints on computation time, propose a method for designing the scheduling based on Particle Swarm Optimization that considers the negotiations rounds among the IM and the TOs. Another interesting field is that of simulation tools, possibly combined with other instruments and approaches.…”
Section: Previous Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, it is presented in the form of average delay (Khan and Zhou [11], Fischetti et al [9], Kroon et al [14], and Vromans et al [20]), secondary and total delay (Larsen et al [15]), punctuality (Andersson et al [3]), and the number of affected passengers (Dewilde et al [8]). However, the importance of the ex-ante measures cannot be denied because the traffic performance is based on the design quality of the timetable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, Schöbel and Kratz [19] and Cicerone et al [5] proposed the price of robustness to calculate the effect of the increased margins, which was defined as the ratio between the cost of the robust timetable and the optimal timetable without robustness. Kroon et al [12] and Fischetti et al [9] proposed weighted average distance (WAD) to find the distributions of runtime margins for a particular train. Carey [4] and Kroon et al [13] Percentage of headways equal to or less than the minimum value (PoH) Runtime Salido et al [17,18] and De Fabris et al [6] Total amount of runtime margin for each individual train (TAoRM)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%