2005
DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family History Assessment to Detect Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer: Conceptual Considerations and a Preliminary Economic Analysis

Abstract: Background: Although the rationale for earlier screening of persons with a family history of colorectal cancer is plausible, there is no direct evidence that earlier assessment is either effective or cost-effective. Objective: To estimate the clinical and economic effect of using family history assessment to identify persons for colorectal cancer screening before age 50. Methods: We developed a decision model to compare costs and outcomes for two scenarios: (a) standard population screening starting at age 50;… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[17][18][19][20][21] We do not use Lynch syndrome-specific family history risk criteria because of the difficulty and high cost in accurately collecting and interpreting family history data for this purpose. 2,3,35 Ours is the first study to model the use of IHC testing and the inclusion of BRAF V600E mutation testing for Lynch syndrome. 2,36 Finally, our analysis differs from a previous US cost-effectiveness analysis that assumed that probands and relatives with Lynch syndrome would undergo prophylactic subtotal colectomy surgery, which is not common practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21] We do not use Lynch syndrome-specific family history risk criteria because of the difficulty and high cost in accurately collecting and interpreting family history data for this purpose. 2,3,35 Ours is the first study to model the use of IHC testing and the inclusion of BRAF V600E mutation testing for Lynch syndrome. 2,36 Finally, our analysis differs from a previous US cost-effectiveness analysis that assumed that probands and relatives with Lynch syndrome would undergo prophylactic subtotal colectomy surgery, which is not common practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24][25] Many of the studies that involve modeling or data analysis have examined genes that, when mutant, predispose to disease at considerably less than 100% penetrance. For example, people at higher than age-adjusted risk for colorectal cancer, based on family history or genetic testing of tumor tissue in relatives, benefit clinically from earlier institution of colonoscopic monitoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, people at higher than age-adjusted risk for colorectal cancer, based on family history or genetic testing of tumor tissue in relatives, benefit clinically from earlier institution of colonoscopic monitoring. 25 The cost-effectiveness of various models of screening for colorectal cancer for more aggressive management compared with the general population has been examined in several studies. [26][27][28][29][30] As improved data on effectiveness of testing, prevalence of mutations, and costs of testing and screening accrued, the costeffectiveness of targeting therapy for colorectal cancer based on genetic screening has been judged reasonable (in terms of earlier diagnosis of tumors and reduced costs) for both individuals and the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En este sentido, es de resaltar que existen referencias en la literatura sobre la dificultad que tendrían los sistemas sanitarios de asumir la carga de trabajo que supondría la realización de colonoscopias a todas aquellas personas con riesgo de desarrollar cáncer colorrectal. Así, la implementación del cribado genético del APC es una de las medidas que podría paliar esta dificultad (14,24). Por otro lado, una revisión sistemática sobre las pruebas genéticas puso de manifiesto que los factores más influyentes sobre el ratio coste-efectividad son la prevalencia de la mutación, el coste del test genético, mortalidad y efectividad del tratamiento (25).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…El factor de ponderación de la calidad de un año de vida puede ir desde el valor 0 (muerte o equivalente), hasta el 1 (salud perfecta). Las utilidades consideradas en el modelo se obtuvieron a partir de varios estudios previos (13,14). El seguimiento anual mediante colonoscopia está indicado tanto en aquellos sujetos a los que no se les realiza el test genético, como en los que tienen un test positivo.…”
Section: Métodosunclassified