Families of Dothideomycetes

Hyde, Kevin D.; Jones, E. B. Gareth; Liu, Jian‐Kui; Ariyawansa, Hiran A.; Boehm, E. W. A.; Boonmee, Saranyaphat; Braun, Uwe; Chomnunti, Putarak; Crous, Pedro W.; Dai, Dong; Diederich, Paul; Dissanayake, Asha J.; Doilom, Mingkhuan; Doveri, F.; Hongsanan, Sinang; Jayawardena, Ruvishika S.; Lawrey, James D.; Li, Yanmei; Liu, Yong Xiang; Lücking, Robert; Monkai, Jutamart; Muggia, Lucía; Nelsen, Matthew P.; Pang, Ka Lai; Phookamsak, Rungtiwa; Senanayake, Indunil C.; Shearer, Carol A.; Suetrong, Satinee; Tanaka, Kazuaki; Thambugala, Kasun M.; Wijayawardene, Nalin N.; Wikee, Saowanee; Wu, Hai Xia; Zhang, Ying; Aguirre-Hudson, Begoña; Alias, Siti Aisyah; Aptroot, André; Bahkali, Ali H.; Bezerra, José Luiz; Bhat, D. Jayarama; Camporesi, Erio; Chukeatirote, Ekachai; Gueidan, Cécile; Hawksworth, David L.; Hirayama, Kazuyuki; Hoog, Sybren de; Kang, Ji Chuan; Knudsen, Kerry; Li, Wen Jing; Li, Xing Hong; Liu, Zou Yi; Mapook, Ausana; McKenzie, Eric H. C.; Miller, Andrew N.; Mortimer, Peter E.; Phillips, Alan J. L.; Raja, Huzefa A.; Scheuer, Christian; Schumm, Felix; Taylor, Joanne E.; Tian, Qing; Tibpromma, Saowaluck; Wanasinghe, Dhanushka N.; Wang, Yong; Xu, Jianchu; Yacharoen, Supalak; Yan, Jiye; Zhang, Min

doi:10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4

Cited by 508 publications

(873 citation statements)

References 401 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

835

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 and 2 with the value of -6929.59087and -8276.09706 respectively. Phylogenetic trees obtained from maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses yielded trees with similar overall topology at species relationship in agreement with previous work based on maximum likelihood (Zhang & Berbee 2001, Schoch et al 2009, Hyde et al 2013, Woudenberg et al 2013. The support values for the different phylogenetic methods vary, with the RAxML bootstrap being higher than the maximum parsimony bootstrap support values in most cases.…”

Section: Phylogenysupporting

confidence: 88%

“…All trees were similar in topology and not significantly different (data not shown). Phylogenetic trees obtained from maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony analyses yielded trees with similar overall topology at species relationship in agreement with previous work based on maximum likelihood (Zhang & Berbee 2001, Schoch et al 2009, Hyde et al 2013). Sexual state -Ascomata immersed, becoming erumpent to near superficial, solitary or scattered, globose to subglobose, broadly or narrowly conical, smooth-walled, ostiolate.…”

Section: Phylogenysupporting

confidence: 88%

“…Several recent studies using multigene analysis and some coupled with morphology have provided the groundwork for classification in Pyrenophora (Berbee 1996, Zhang & Berbee 2001, Zhang et al 2012, Hyde et al 2013. We have been working on the genera of Pleosporales in order to provide a natural classification via morphological and phylogenetic characterization (Zhang et al 2012, Ariyawansa et al 2013a, b, c, Hyde et al 2013, Ariyawansa et al 2014.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Pyrenophora

Ariyawansa¹,

Kang²,

Chukeatirote³

et al. 2014

Mycosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the first in a series of papers in which we revisit genera of fungi to provide baseline data for future study. In this article we examine the genus Pyrenophora and provide details of morphology, phylogeny and the current status of species. Pyrenophora is a genus of saprobic and plant pathogenic fungi with a worldwide distribution, commonly associated with leaves, wood, cereals and other grasses. A phylogeny for Pyrenophora (sexual state of Drechslera) and allied genera is presented based on analysis of ITS, GPDH, RPB2, nrSSU and nrLSU DNA sequence datasets. Pyrenophora is a monophyletic genus in Pleosporaceae. Pyrenophora sexual states cluster with their expected Drechslera asexual states. As a genus can now only have one name we synonymise Drechslera under Pyrenophora.

show abstract

Section: Phylogenysupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Phylogenysupporting

confidence: 88%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Pyrenophora

Ariyawansa¹,

Kang²,

Chukeatirote³

et al. 2014

Mycosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The family represents foliar, biotrophic epiphytes, which mostly can be found on the lower leaf surface as small black dots. Species in this family are characterized by flattened, black-blue or greenish to black thyriothecia, easily removed from the host surface, poorly developed at the base, comprising interwoven hyphae, with a central ostiole, and up to multi transseptate, hyaline ascospores (Clements & Shear 1931, Batista 1959, von Arx & Müller 1975, Barr 1987, Kirk et al 2008, Lumbsch & Huhndorf 2010, Wu et al 2011, Hyde et al 2013, Hongsanan et al 2015a). Micropeltidaceae and Microthyriaceae were placed in Microthyriales (Dothideomycetes) based on their flattened, easily removed thyriothecia, and poorly-developed base.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Phylogenetic placement of Micropeltidaceae

Hongsanan¹

2017

Mycosphere

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract"Microthyriaceae-like" taxa are fungal epiphytes which appear as black dots on the host surface. The families Micropeltidaceae and Microthyriaceae have been poorly studied, particularly with molecular data, due to the difficulty in obtaining pure cultures. The two families were placed in Microthyriales in many studies based on thyriothecial characters. Two species of Micropeltidaceae (Micropeltis dendrophthoes and M. zingiberacicola ) clustered at the base of Dothideomycetes and were unrelated to Microthyriaceae in previous phylogenetic trees. Their placements were treated as unresolved. We restudied sequence data of Micropeltidaceae and its related strains to clarify the current placement using authentic strains available in GenBank. Phylogenetic analyses generated from maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses (used ITS, LSU, RPB2, SSU and TEF1 sequence data) including Blast results, indicate that the current placement of Micropeltidaceae is in Ostropales (Lecanoromycetes), although it is not strongly supported. A revised phylogenetic tree for Micropeltidaceae and selected families from Dothideomycetes, Eurotiomycetes, Lecanoromycetes, Leotiomycetes and Sordariomycetes is provided with discussions in this paper.

show abstract

“…It is a ubiquitous class of fungi whose members span a wide spectrum of lifestyles and host interactions [1][2][3]. Members of the Dothideomycetes can cause disease in every major crop [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lignocellulolytic Capability of Endophytic Phyllosticta sp.

CB¹

2017

J Bacteriol Mycol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Dothideomycetes represent the largest fungal class of Ascomycota. It is an ubiquitous class of fungi whose members span a wide spectrum of lifestyles and host interactions. The endophytic fungus Phyllosticta is one members of the Dothideomycetes, causing disease in economic crops. Phyllosticta was screened for the degradation of lignocellulosic biomass of commercial relevance, such as rice straw, rice husk, sorghum, wheat straw, miscanthus, lavender flower, and lavender straw. The highest degrading strains were identified from an initial screen and further analyzed for the secretion of lignocellulosic enzymes during growth on the different biomasses. With Phyllosticta capitalensis (MFLUCC14-0233), maximum activity of arabinase (944.18 U/ml culture), cellulase (27.10 U/ml), xylanase (10.85 U/ml), pectinase (465.47 U/ml), and laccase (35.68 U/ml) activities could be detected in the secretome during growth on lavender flowers and lavender straw. Phyllosticta capitalensis is thus an interesting new strain for the production of lignocellulosic enzymes during growth on cheap agro-industrial biomass. Keywords:Agro-industrial residues; Biological pretreatment; Dothideomycetes; Lignocellulosic biomass; Lignocellulytic enzyme; Phyllosticta IntroductionThe Dothideomycetes represent the largest fungal class within the phylum Ascomycota. It is a ubiquitous class of fungi whose members span a wide spectrum of lifestyles and host interactions [1][2][3]. Members of the Dothideomycetes can cause disease in every major crop [4]. Approximately 1,300 genera and 19,000 species have been identified either as endophytes, plant pathogens, or as saprophytes degrading plant biomass, thus threatening agriculture and food security throughout the world [5][6][7][8]. In addition to their mode of life, the Dothideomycetes are known for producing secondary metabolites grouped into four main categories based on their biosynthetic origin: polyketides, non-ribosomal peptides, terpenoids and tryptophan derivatives [9]. These secondary metabolites can be both toxic and beneficial to plants and humankind in applications such as agrochemicals, antibiotics, immunosuppressant's, antiparasitics, antioxidants and anticancer agents [10]. New Dothideomycetes are still being discovered worldwide and a large number of these strains remained unexplored regarding their potential use in biotechnology [11][12].Endophytes provide a broad variety of bioactive secondary metabolites with unique structures and so this class of fungi could be used as potential "nanofactories" producing a range of "green" alternatives to currently employed chemicals [13]. Although the ecological significance of endophytes is not completely clear, it is known that these fungi can exploit dead leaves immediately after their senescence and before they fall from the tree [14], and so could be also exploited for the production of enzymes acting on plant biomass.A well-known representative of Dothideomycetes fungi in metabolite studies is Phyllosticta (with a Guignardia anamorph)...

show abstract

Families of Dothideomycetes

Cited by 508 publications

References 401 publications

Pyrenophora

Pyrenophora

Phylogenetic placement of Micropeltidaceae

Lignocellulolytic Capability of Endophytic Phyllosticta sp.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About