1973
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.107.4.591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familial focal facial dermal dysplasia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 15 years old, he had a right inguinal hernia repair; his abdominal ultrasound and echocardiograph were normal. A biopsy taken from the bitemporal lesions revealed hypoplastic dermis along with an absence of subcutaneous fat, typical of that previously described in affected individuals (1, 11, 12). His neurological evaluation was within normal limits, and he graduated from high school with honors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…At 15 years old, he had a right inguinal hernia repair; his abdominal ultrasound and echocardiograph were normal. A biopsy taken from the bitemporal lesions revealed hypoplastic dermis along with an absence of subcutaneous fat, typical of that previously described in affected individuals (1, 11, 12). His neurological evaluation was within normal limits, and he graduated from high school with honors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These lesions typically are round, depressed areas that range from one to ten in number and up to one cm in diameter [Sybert, ]. However, these lesions may be larger, solid and single defects measuring up to six cm in diameter [McGeoch and Reed, ; Rudolph et al, ]. The atrophic skin normally lacks adnexal structures [Rudolph et al, ; Kowalski and Fenske, ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The atrophic skin normally lacks adnexal structures [Rudolph et al, ; Kowalski and Fenske, ]. The subcutaneous fat is absent and skeletal muscle is attached to the epidermis, consistent with a mesodermal dysplasia (McGeoch and Reed, ; Setleis et al, ; Tukel et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations