2013
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/4/88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAINTUBVRISTANDARD STAR FIELDS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
50
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
50
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For as definitive a case as possible, with a different instrumental setup, the one-sigma photometric accuracy in measuring a single optimal V-band magnitude is ±0.0144 mag from Landolt (2009 , Table 3), ±0.0069 from Landolt (2013 , Table 4), and ±0.0084 mag from Landolt (1992, Table 2). For a definitive case in measuring the mean errors of a single CCD observation, Clem & Landolt (2013) give 0.0245±0.0159 for the V-band. The Poisson and systematic errors must be added together in quadrature to get the total errors.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For as definitive a case as possible, with a different instrumental setup, the one-sigma photometric accuracy in measuring a single optimal V-band magnitude is ±0.0144 mag from Landolt (2009 , Table 3), ±0.0069 from Landolt (2013 , Table 4), and ±0.0084 mag from Landolt (1992, Table 2). For a definitive case in measuring the mean errors of a single CCD observation, Clem & Landolt (2013) give 0.0245±0.0159 for the V-band. The Poisson and systematic errors must be added together in quadrature to get the total errors.…”
Section: Photometrymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The objects were targeted, whenever possible, at different phase angles, aiming at the widest spread possible. Along with the TNOs we targeted several standard star fields each night (from Landolt 1992;and Clem & Landolt 2013), or they were provided by the observatory, as in the case of the Liverpool telescope. We aimed at observing three different fields at three different airmasses per night to cover the range of airmasses of our main targets.…”
Section: Observations and Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to this effect, the photometric errors from SExtractor are in general underestimated (see Jeon et al (2010)). We performed photometric calibrations with the standard star catalog near the SEP region from Clem & Landolt (2013). This calibration converts from the instrumental magnitude to the standard Johnson UBV and Kron-Cousins RI systems.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%