2018
DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(17)30338-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faecal microbiota transplantation versus placebo for moderate-to-severe irritable bowel syndrome: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
433
3
16

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(500 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
21
433
3
16
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, there have been a total of 71 such studies investigating the role of FMT in IBD; of these, only four are prospective randomised controlled trials, limited to patients with ulcerative colitis 136–139. Five other reviewed randomised studies investigated the use of FMT in IBS,140 slow transit constipation,141 hepatic encephalopathy142 and metabolic syndrome 143 144…”
Section: Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, there have been a total of 71 such studies investigating the role of FMT in IBD; of these, only four are prospective randomised controlled trials, limited to patients with ulcerative colitis 136–139. Five other reviewed randomised studies investigated the use of FMT in IBS,140 slow transit constipation,141 hepatic encephalopathy142 and metabolic syndrome 143 144…”
Section: Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a double blind, placebo controlled RCT that recruited 90 patients with IBS with diarrhoea or with diarrhoea and constipation,140 the primary endpoint only just reached statistical significance in inducing symptom relief (as assessed by a 75 point reduction in IBS severity scoring system at 3 months following a single infusion FMT by colonoscopy) (P=0.049). The second RCT randomised 60 patients with slow transit constipation to either 6 consecutive days of nasogastric delivered FMT or conventional treatment 141.…”
Section: Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one RCT among patients with moderate-to-severe IBS, higher response (p=0.049) rates at three months, defined as a 75point improvement in the IBS severity scoring system, were observed in patients receiving FMT (65%) compared to those receiving placebo (43%). However, differences were no longer significant at 12 months followup 188 . On the other hand, a separate multicenter RCT 189 comparing FMT capsules to placebo in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS was unable to demonstrate significant symptom relief at three months with FMT, although subgroup analysis suggested patients with post-infectious IBS experienced greater improvement with FMT compared to placebo (p=0.09).…”
Section: Functional Gi Disordersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Even so, it was the placebo, not the FMT group, that showed greater symptom relief ( P = .012) and improved QoL ( P = .003) . Another study by including 90 IBS patients found significant symptom improvement with freshly prepared, frozen FMT delivered through colonoscopy into the colon when compared to placebo ( P = .049) . These conflicting findings warrant the investigation of various factors which may contribute toward the efficacy of FMT, such as the method of bowel preparation, route of delivery, duration of treatment, and the number of fecal bacteria delivered.…”
Section: Fmtmentioning
confidence: 99%