2012
DOI: 10.2308/isys-50259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Planned Adoption of Continuous Monitoring Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(46 reference statements)
2
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The UTAUT synthesizes known conditions for assessment of the likelihood of technology adoption (Venkatesh et al 2003) and highlights the need for a structural framework that guides the adoption and utilization of technology in firms. Gonzalez et al (2012) used the UTAUT to explore the intention of businesses to adopt continuous monitoring technology(CMT) and assumed that the intentions of the organization are dependent on the intentions of the individuals in the firm and eliminated individual demographics from their UTAUT. Their findings are in line with the TAM assertion that PU is the most significant factor in the adoption of new technology, where performance expectancy is equivalent to PU but on the firm level.…”
Section: The Unified Theory Of Adoption and Utilization Of Technology (Utaut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UTAUT synthesizes known conditions for assessment of the likelihood of technology adoption (Venkatesh et al 2003) and highlights the need for a structural framework that guides the adoption and utilization of technology in firms. Gonzalez et al (2012) used the UTAUT to explore the intention of businesses to adopt continuous monitoring technology(CMT) and assumed that the intentions of the organization are dependent on the intentions of the individuals in the firm and eliminated individual demographics from their UTAUT. Their findings are in line with the TAM assertion that PU is the most significant factor in the adoption of new technology, where performance expectancy is equivalent to PU but on the firm level.…”
Section: The Unified Theory Of Adoption and Utilization Of Technology (Utaut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings are in line with the TAM assertion that PU is the most significant factor in the adoption of new technology, where performance expectancy is equivalent to PU but on the firm level. Facilitating conditions and social influence were also determinants of CMT adoption and effort expectancy was found to not be significant in its adoption (Gonzalez et al 2012). Venkatesh et al (2012) established UTAUT2 incorporating constructs to better explain the consumer's adoption of technology.…”
Section: The Unified Theory Of Adoption and Utilization Of Technology (Utaut)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Venkatesh et al (2003), social influence measures the extent to which significant others such as family, friends, and media influence a person's intention to adopt the technology. Gonzalez et al (2012) indicated that social influence has a significant effect on behavioral intention. This is consistent with the findings of Venkatesh et al (2011), Escobar-Rodríguez & Carvajal-Trujillo (2014, Hendarman and Tjakraatmadja (2014), Ifinedo (2012), Isaac et al (2017), Martins et al (2014).…”
Section: Social Influence (Si)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jadi media massa dan advertensi dapat berperan dalam menciptakan kesadaran dan pengetahuan, penyuluhan berguna untuk memersuasi, pengaruh antar pribadi berfungsi bagi keputusan untuk menerima atau menolak inovasi dan pengalaman dalam menggunakan inovasi dapat menjadi sumber konfirmasi untuk menerapkan inovasi atau sebaliknya dan secara tegas terjadi juga dengan variabel-variabel sistem sosial yang berperan terutama pada tahap awal ( pengetahuan) dan tahap berikutnya (H.R. Burhan Bungin,2006); pengaruh sosial terhadap rencana adopsi teknologi berkelanjutan (Gonzalez, Sharma, & Galletta, 2012).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified