2014
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biu095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Efficacy of Forward-Looking Infrared in Polar Bear Den Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
20
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates of FLIR efficacy also reflect only those dens that are available to be detected. Depth of snow covering a den can significantly affect the probability that FLIR will be able to detect a den (Robinson et al 2014). Using artificial dens of varying depth, Robinson et al (2014) observed that dens with snow depth >100 cm were not detectable with handheld FLIR devices.…”
Section: Den Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimates of FLIR efficacy also reflect only those dens that are available to be detected. Depth of snow covering a den can significantly affect the probability that FLIR will be able to detect a den (Robinson et al 2014). Using artificial dens of varying depth, Robinson et al (2014) observed that dens with snow depth >100 cm were not detectable with handheld FLIR devices.…”
Section: Den Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depth of snow covering a den can significantly affect the probability that FLIR will be able to detect a den (Robinson et al 2014). Using artificial dens of varying depth, Robinson et al (2014) observed that dens with snow depth >100 cm were not detectable with handheld FLIR devices. Although Amstrup et al (2004) was able to detect all dens at least once during their multiple surveys, all dens surveyed had snow depths <100 cm.…”
Section: Den Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerial and handheld FLIR camera platforms have been evaluated to detect occupied and human-made artificial polar bear and grizzly bear dens (Amstrup et al, 2004;Robinson, Smith, Larsen, & Kirschhoffer, 2014;Shideler & Perham, 2013). Each of these previous studies revealed limitations on the effectiveness of FLIR cameras under varying ambient conditions that may influence odds of detection (detection).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We arranged dens linearly relative to one another and we separated each by approximately 7.6 m. We configured dens to mimic the internal dimensions of an average single‐chambered polar bear den (79 cm height, 148 cm length, and 127 cm width, Durner et al 2003). Similar to Robinson et al (2014), we used a 200‐watt ceramic heater in each den to simulate the heat generated by a denning polar bear. To assess the influence of snow depth and denning stage on noise reception, we varied 2 characteristics of the den configuration: roof thickness and the presence of an egress opening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study site near Milne Point, Alaska, USA, where we made acoustics measurements inside 4 artificial polar bear snow dens in 2010. Robinson et al [2014] provides details on den excavation). We arranged dens linearly relative to one another and we separated each by approximately 7.6 m. We configured dens to mimic the internal dimensions of an average singlechambered polar bear den (79 cm height, 148 cm length, and 127 cm width, Durner et al 2003).…”
Section: Methods Artificial Dens and Noise Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%