Factors Driving Success of Cost Management Practices in Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

Elghaish, Faris; Hosseini, M. Reza; Talebi, Saeed; Abrishami, Sepehr; Martek, Igor; Kagioglou, Mike

doi:10.3390/su12229539

Cited by 16 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 48 publications

(80 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…IPD projects were seen to lack any accurate cost estimation methodology at the front-end of projects (Elghaish et al , 2019) and fair profit distribution (Teng et al , 2019) was identified as the key weakness in IPD cost management (Elghaish and Abrishami, 2020a). Discussion of IPD’s cost management deficiency invoked integration of several concepts (Elghaish et al , 2020b). By way of defense, Love et al (2017) argued that cost certainty improved when BIM was coupled with IPD.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interplay of IPD and BIM: a systematic literature review

Karasu

Aaltonen²,

Haapasalo³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Integrated project delivery (IPD) and building information modeling (BIM) have been discussed as prominent collaborative concepts in recent architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) literature, thus recommended for more advanced value creation. However, they have been studied predominantly as discrete even though they are typically highly interrelated. This study aims to enhance collaboration in AEC projects by tracing recent trends in IPD and BIM literature by making sense of trends and by exploring how their interplay has been discussed and conceptualized. Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review draws on Scopus and Web of Science as the primary databases. In total, 120 academic papers and review articles were sourced. Yet, the final sample includes 71 sources from the past decade (2011–2020), focusing on both IPD and BIM. Findings This study identifies 11 interrelated and overlapping themes that are indicative of trends in the recent IPD and BIM literature. This research found that among the identified themes, the clusters of sustainability, transformation and increasing the competence level of staff in the AEC industry, in addition to the concept of quality, require more extensive research in the context of IPD and BIM. Additionally, this study identifies four different approaches to the interplay of IPD and BIM, indicating an absence of scholarly consistency. Originality/value Based on the systematic analysis of the recent literature, this study indicates that IPD and BIM have several joint fundamental cornerstones. It is evident that both concepts support the implementation of each other. The success of implementing either one is strongly related to the other. Additionally, we have not found earlier systematic literature reviews that examine the interplay between IPD and BIM in the recent AEC literature.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interplay of IPD and BIM: a systematic literature review

Karasu

Aaltonen²,

Haapasalo³

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…By prioritizing the perspectives and voices of these actors, new concepts and insights can emerge throughout the entire research process, including data collection, analysis, and the reporting of findings [44]. While there are studies that approach this topic through methods such as systematic literature review [45,46], case studies [10], and surveys [47], a qualitative approach centred around multidisciplinary experts view is rather a less-explored, particularly in an Australian context.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[47] 1. The critical success factors of cost management practices to facilitate Integrated project delivery (IPD); 2.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The State of Industry 4.0 in the Australian Construction Industry: An Examination of Industry and Academic Point of View

Soltani,

Maxwell,

Rashidi

2023

Buildings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to provide an overview of the current state of Industry 4.0 (IR 4.0) with regard to construction in Australia and to identify the key factors that are driving and hindering its adoption. A literature review and desktop review were conducted to extract mainstream topics, followed by a two-folded workshop designed with a multidisciplinary team of academics, as well as representatives of mainstream firms and peak bodies from the construction value chain. Our study has highlighted the importance of considering both technological and human-related factors in the adoption of IR 4.0 to address barriers that have been traditionally overlooked, and work towards a more successful and holistic implementation of this transformative paradigm. By considering the social aspects of construction, prioritizing data-driven approaches with a focus on privacy and ethics, and emphasizing integration, these facilitators contribute to the effective implementation and success of IR 4.0 in the construction industry. The findings of this study have significant implications for the construction industry in Australia. Addressing the barriers to digital construction adoption and embracing IR 4.0 technologies can help the industry to improve productivity, reduce costs, and enhance sustainability. Additionally, investing in education and training can help to build the necessary skills and capabilities needed to drive the industry forward in the digital age.

show abstract

“…In the case of conventional PDMs, contractors and manufacturers are involved in the project after the project's design phase. Thereby, traditional construction processes tend to incur more costs from rework resulting from miscoordination, quality issues, the inefficiency of project delivery times, poor performance, and client dissatisfaction with the product delivered [44].…”

Section: Integrated Project Delivery (Ipd)mentioning

confidence: 99%

A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction

Bhuiyan

Hammad

2023

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, the performance of the construction industry has highlighted the increased need for better resource efficiency, improved productivity, less waste, and increased value through sustainable construction practices. The core concept of sustainable construction is to maximize value and minimize harm by achieving a balance between social, economic, technical, and environmental aspects, commonly known as the pillars of sustainability. The decision regarding which structural material to select for any construction project is traditionally made based on technical and economic considerations with little or no attention paid to social and environmental aspects. Furthermore, the majority of the available literature on the subject considered three sustainability pillars (i.e., environmental, social, and economic), ignoring the influence of technical aspects for overall sustainability assessment. Industry experts have also noted an unfulfilled need for a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) technique that can integrate all stakeholders’ (project owner, designer, and constructor) opinions into the selection process. Hence, this research developed a decision support system (DSS) involving MCDM techniques to aid in selecting the most sustainable structural material, considering the four pillars of sustainability in the integrated project delivery (IPD) framework. A hybrid MCDM method combining AHP, TOPSIS, and VIKOR in a fuzzy environment was used to develop the DSS. A hypothetical eight-story building was considered for a case study to validate the developed DSS. The result shows that user preferences highly govern the final ranking of the alternative options of structural materials. Timber was chosen as the most sustainable option once the stakeholders assigned balanced importance to all factors of sustainable construction practices. The developed DSS was designed to be generic, can be used by any group of industry practitioners, and is expected to enhance objectivity and consistency of the decision-making process as a step towards achieving sustainable construction.

show abstract

Factors Driving Success of Cost Management Practices in Integrated Project Delivery (IPD)

Cited by 16 publications

References 48 publications

The interplay of IPD and BIM: a systematic literature review

The interplay of IPD and BIM: a systematic literature review

The State of Industry 4.0 in the Australian Construction Industry: An Examination of Industry and Academic Point of View

A Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Selecting the Most Sustainable Structural Material for a Multistory Building Construction

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About