Factor analysis of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in American Indian women

Abstract

The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES‐D) is widely used to assess depressive symptoms in the general population. It lacks validation for widespread use within the American Indian population, however. To address this gap, we explored and confirmed the factor structure of the CES‐D among a community sample of southeastern American Indian women. We analyzed data from a sample of 150 American Indian women ages 18–50 from a southeastern tribe who had complete responses on the CES‐D as part of a larger cross‐sectional, community‐engaged study. We performed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the measure's validity. We examined EFA models ranging from one to five factors, with the four‐factor structure yielding the best overall model fit (CFI = 1.00, TLI = 0.99, RMSEA = 0.03). Differences between the four‐factor EFA‐retained structure from our sample and Radloff's four‐factor structure emerged. Only the interpersonal factor was common to both factor structures. Our study findings confirm the validity of the original four‐factor structure of the CES‐D for younger adult American Indian women in the southeast. Contrasting findings with the EFA‐retained structure, however, provide a more nuanced interpretation of our results.