2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.05.059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Facile evaluation of coating thickness on membranes using ATR-FTIR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The minor variations in peak sizes did not follow a trend with the changing parameters. They were related to the heterogeneity in the sample x s, which are known to affect FTIR spectral intensities …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The minor variations in peak sizes did not follow a trend with the changing parameters. They were related to the heterogeneity in the sample x s, which are known to affect FTIR spectral intensities …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For deeply analyzing the result, the software of Peak Fit V4.12 was used for resolution of ATR‐IR spectra peaks and area calculation. In comparison to M ami ‐0, the intensity of the PSf characterized band (1585 cm −1 ) of M ami decreased after modified by EDA, indirectly indicating more PA was produced on membrane surface . To confirm this conclusion, the integral area ratios of characteristic peaks of PA and PSf were calculated to be as the index of the amount of PA. R = A 1663 + A 1610 + A 1545 /A 1585 (A represents the area of characterized bond) was used to represent the integral area ratio.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The results indicate that the membrane surface was successfully and uniformly modified over the entire element, while contact angle data also showed a significant increase in surface hydrophobicity. A recently developed method for the quantitative evaluation of polymer coating thickness using ATR-FTIR showed that the average DG ~0.12 corresponds to an average grafted layer thickness of about 35 nm [ 48 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%