Extraction of vector information using a novel tactile display

Eves, David A.; Novák, Miroslav

doi:10.1016/s0141-9382(98)00018-3

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…see Eves and Novak, 1998;Jeram and Prasad, 2005;Rupert, 2000;Van Erp, 2005;). Rupert defined "intuition" as "the power of attaining direct knowledge or cognition without rational thought and inference" (p. A96; cf.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the effectiveness of “intuitive” vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator

Reed

Spence

2006

Accident Analysis & Prevention

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing the effectiveness of “intuitive” vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator

Reed

Spence

2006

Accident Analysis & Prevention

144

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…We further examined whether IMR is more commonly observed in specific directions and less in other directions, which might be consistent with the oblique effect found in visual and somatosensory domains (Essock et al, 1992, 1997; Eves and Novak, 1998). Results across participants showed that IMR tended to occur in certain stimulus directions (around 120° and –120°) and spatio-temporal combinations (Figure 4).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 53%

Illusory Motion Reversal in Touch

Hsu¹,

Yeh

Huang

et al. 2019

Front. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Psychophysical visual experiments have shown illusory motion reversal (IMR), in which the perceived direction of motion is the opposite of its actual direction. The tactile form of this illusion has also been reported. However, it remains unclear which stimulus characteristics affect the magnitude of IMR. We closely examined the effect of stimulus characteristics on IMR by presenting moving sinusoid gratings and random-dot patterns to 10 participants’ fingerpads at different spatial periods, speeds, and indentation depths. All participants perceived a motion direction opposite to the veridical direction some of the time. The illusion was more prevalent at spatial periods of 1 and 2 mm and at extreme speeds of 20 and 320 mm/s. We observed stronger IMR for gratings and much weaker IMR for a random-dot pattern, indicating that edge orientation might be a major contributor to this illusion. These results show that the optimal parameters for IMR are consistent with the characteristics of motion-selective neurons in the somatosensory cortex, as most of these neurons are also orientation-selective. We speculate that these neurons could be the neural substrate that accounts for tactile IMR.

show abstract

“…Electrocutaneous stimuli are patterns of small electric currents [25] that stimulate cutaneous nerve fibers of the afferent nervous system. In [26] these were used for communicating vector information on a plane by applying them on the three phalanges of three fingers (index, middle and ring). The 3x3 array allowed for discern cues regarding both the direction and magnitude on the plane of the hand without other kinds of stimuli.…”

Section: Related Haptic Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%