2017
DOI: 10.1101/219162
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting biological age from biomedical data via deep learning: too much of a good thing?

Abstract: Aging-related physiological changes are systemic and, at least in humans, are linearly associated with age. Therefore, linear combinations of physiological measures trained to estimate chronological age have recently emerged as a practical way to quantify aging in the form of biological age. Aging acceleration, defined as the difference between the predicted and chronological age was found to be elevated in patients with major diseases and is predictive of mortality. In this work, we compare three increasingly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this context, numerous studies are indicating that ageing contributes to pathogenesis of several chronic lung diseases, some of them virtually exclusive to older adults, whereas others may occur at any age, usually with a worse prognosis in adults over 65 years [23]. However, these studies have been carried out considering chronological age, which offers limited information regarding the complex processes driving biological ageing [9,24]. Thus, it is the phenotypic age, usually influenced by a complex combination of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors that plays an important role in susceptibility to morbidity and mortality [10,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, numerous studies are indicating that ageing contributes to pathogenesis of several chronic lung diseases, some of them virtually exclusive to older adults, whereas others may occur at any age, usually with a worse prognosis in adults over 65 years [23]. However, these studies have been carried out considering chronological age, which offers limited information regarding the complex processes driving biological ageing [9,24]. Thus, it is the phenotypic age, usually influenced by a complex combination of genetic, lifestyle, and environmental factors that plays an important role in susceptibility to morbidity and mortality [10,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To answer this question, we removed the transformer blocks from our model and passed the CNN's final output directly to a linear layer. 1D CNNs are frequently used in timeseries classification [27,52], and have been applied to data from wearable devices before [36,49,56] (Delong). Note that while substantial class imbalance precludes statistically significant results on some tasks ("Flu Positivity", "Severe Fever", and "Severe Cough"), Our Model performs better than all baselines and ablations when jointly evaluating performance across all tasks to increase statistical power (Figure 2).…”
Section: Experiments 1: Realistic Single Domain Prediction Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although for blood alone the clock's correlation with age was lower than what was reported in the original study, it still predicts mortality better than a variety of environmental and individual characteristics associated with increased risks of dying (Marioni et al, 2015). Other biological estimators exist, including a model based on physical activity where there was a correlation of 0.75 with chronological age (Pyrkov et al, 2018). For paleodemographers, these estimates provide a level of accuracy that one might strive to achieve with skeletal markers of age, as long as reasonably good morphological features can be identified and analyzed appropriately.…”
Section: Age Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%