2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.06.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extinction of conditioned taste aversion is related to the aversion strength and associated with c-fos expression in the insular cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
4
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further examination of the Figure 3A c-Fos data largely conformed to expectation. A significant difference between training-session c-Fos observed in WPE-CTA and WPE-sham rats (Fisher's LSD, p = 0.044) replicated previous studies (Navarro et al 2000b;Koh and Bernstein 2005;Wilkins and Bernstein 2006;Hadamitzky et al 2015). The difference between the WPE-CTA and WPE-LiCl groups (Fisher's LSD, p = 0.549) failed to achieve significance here, but by far the simplest explanation for this lack of significance, which is of little import in the current study, is the fact that the current protocol was specifically designed to minimize it: measurements for each rat-one in an anterior GC slice, one in a middle GC slice, and one in a posterior GC slice ( Figure 4A; see Methods).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further examination of the Figure 3A c-Fos data largely conformed to expectation. A significant difference between training-session c-Fos observed in WPE-CTA and WPE-sham rats (Fisher's LSD, p = 0.044) replicated previous studies (Navarro et al 2000b;Koh and Bernstein 2005;Wilkins and Bernstein 2006;Hadamitzky et al 2015). The difference between the WPE-CTA and WPE-LiCl groups (Fisher's LSD, p = 0.549) failed to achieve significance here, but by far the simplest explanation for this lack of significance, which is of little import in the current study, is the fact that the current protocol was specifically designed to minimize it: measurements for each rat-one in an anterior GC slice, one in a middle GC slice, and one in a posterior GC slice ( Figure 4A; see Methods).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Given that CTA learning has repeatedly been associated with increased levels of c-Fos expression in GC (Koh and Bernstein 2005;Hadamitzky et al 2015;Soto et al 2017), and that TPE enhances learning , we hypothesized that TPE would enhance learning-related c-Fos expression in GC. We therefore compared c-Fos in CTA-conditioned TPE rats to that of five controls: 1) rats that underwent the exact same CTA -conditioning procedure, but were preexposed only to water (i.e., WPE rats); 2-3) rats that received TPE or WPE, but for which the "training trial" was actually a "sham-training" trial in which sucrose was delivered was paired with harmless saline injection; and 4-5) rats that received TPE or WPE followed by "training" that consisted of LiCl alone (Figure 1).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…22 Indeed, c-Fos is widely used as an activity indicator in many studies measuring taste induced activity in the central taste system. 48, 49, 50 A spike in c-Fos immunoreactivity in the central amygdala and insular cortex regions of brain was observed during taste aversion conditioning and on introduction of novel tastants. 51 Other work reported that c-Fos KO animals have deficits in the normal long-term learning and memory that is normally associated with aversive taste learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that the posterior insular cortex is involved in the retrieval of fear extinction memory in rodents. The insular cortex is important for the acquisition and extinction of conditioned taste aversion (16), and the extinction rate is positively correlated with c-fos messenger RNA expression in rats (17). Bilateral inhibition of the posterior insular cortex during stress exposure prevented the stress-mitigating effect of safety signals (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%